Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 5 August 2005:
Vol. 309. no. 5736, p. 896
DOI: 10.1126/science.1112509

Brevia

Extreme Waves Under Hurricane Ivan

David W. Wang,* Douglas A. Mitchell, William J. Teague, Ewa Jarosz, Mark S. Hulbert

Hurricane Ivan, a category 4 storm, passed directly over six wave-tide gauges deployed by the Naval Research Laboratory on the outer continental shelf in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Waves were observed with significant wave heights reaching 17.9 meters and maximum crest-to-trough individual wave heights of 27.7 meters (91 feet). Analysis suggests that significant wave heights likely surpassed 21 meters (69 feet) and that maximum crest-to-trough individual wave heights exceeded 40 meters (132 feet) near the eyewall.

Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dwang{at}nrlssc.navy.mil

On 15 September 2004, the center of Hurricane Ivan (Fig. 1A and fig. S1) passed directly over six wave-tide gauges deployed by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), at depths of 60 and 90 m, on the outer continental shelf in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico, allowing us to measure the extreme waves directly under a category 4 hurricane (1). We calculated significant wave height (Hs) and maximum individual wave height (Hmax), two parameters commonly used to characterize wave fields (2).


 Fig. 1. (A) Satellite image of Hurricane Ivan from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) at 1850 universal time, 15 September 2004 (provided by NRL's Ocean Optics Group). The eye of Hurricane Ivan is clearly shown just southeast of the boot of Louisiana. NRL moorings are shown as blue dots [northern line (60 m), moorings 1, 2, and 3; southern line (90 m), moorings 4, 5, and 6]. The NDBC buoy is shown as a red circle, and the track of Hurricane Ivan is shown as a green dashed line with squares marking the hurricane's center every 3 hours. (Inset) Location of Ivan at the time of measurement. (B) Time evolution of Hs (circles) and Hmax (crosses) for the six NRL moorings, Hs for NDBC buoy 42040 (dotted line), and radial distance to Ivan's center (squares). (C) Hs and Hmax as a function of normalized radial distance (r/R). The red dashed line represents the exponential relation (Eq. 1); digitized values of a segment 15° clockwise from the forward direction of a numerically simulated wave field are denoted by black asterisks. The blue dashed line represents Hmax = 1.9Hs, and circles and crosses are as in (B). [View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]
 
During Ivan's approach, Hs and Hmax rapidly increased and reached peak values when the radial distance between the eye's center and the moorings was ~75 km (Fig. 1B). Hs reached maximum values of 17.9, 16.1, and 17.1 m at moorings 3, 4, and 5, respectively. These Hs values were larger than those measured the same day by National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy 42040 (Fig. 1A), which recorded the largest Hs (15.96 m) ever reported by NDBC. The largest Hmax reached 27.7 m (91 ft) at mooring 3; out of 146 waves measured at moorings 3, 4, and 5, there were 24 individual waves with heights greater than 15 m (50 ft) (1).

The measured values of Hs and Hmax depict the radial variability of the hurricane wave field in the range 1 ≤ r/R ≤ 8 (Fig. 1C), where r is the radial distance from the moorings to the eye's center and R is the radius of maximum winds (40 km) (3). Hs increased rapidly as the normalized radial distance approached 1 (Fig. 1, B and C) and can be approximated by an exponential curve of the form Hs = a(r/R)bexp[–(r/R)c], where a = 56.61 m, b = –0.96, and c = –0.94 (Eq. 1). This compares well with a numerical model (4), provided the model's Hs is set to 21 m at r/R = 1 (Fig. 1C). Past observations of Hmax during hurricane-generated seas suggest that Hmax can reach 1.9Hs (5), which is consistent with the upper limit of our measurements (Fig. 1B).

The wave-sampling strategy (1) employed captured a small segment of the wave field, suggesting our measurements likely missed the largest waves near the storm's eyewall. The largest measured Hs reached 17.9 m at a radial distance of 73 km, about 30 km from the strongest winds. Furthermore, our measurements, from the forward face of Ivan, are likely ~85% of the maximum Hs typically found in the right quadrant (4, 6). These factors strongly suggest the wave field associated with Ivan should generate maximum Hs values greater than 21 m and Hmax values greater than 40 m at r/R = 1.

The values of Hs measured here, possibly reduced by shoaling, are larger than those predicted by several parametric wave models developed for deep water conditions. Young (6) proposed a semi-empirical model based on R, maximum wind speed (Umax), and hurricane translation speed (Vt); with R = 40 km, Vt = 6 m s–1, and Umax = 60 m s–1, the model predicts a maximum Hs of 15.1 m. Hsu (7) suggested a simple empirically determined formula, Hs = 0.2 (PRP0), where PR = 1013 mbar is the pressure at the edge of the hurricane and P0 = 935 mbar is the central pressure, resulting in an Hs of 15.6 m. Underestimation by these models likely stems from the absence of wave data under intense storms. Measurements of the extremely large waves directly under Ivan may act as a starting point for improving our understanding of the waves generated by the most powerful hurricanes.


References and Notes

  • 1. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
  • 2. M. J. Tucker, Waves in Ocean Engineering: Measurement, Analysis, Interpretations (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1991).
  • 3. Hurricane Research Division, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, "Hurricane Ivan 2004" (available at www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_pages/ivan2004/).
  • 4. Coastal Engineering Research Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Shore Protection Manual (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1984), vol. 1.
  • 5. R. G. Bea, in Proceedings of the Sixth Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, 76 to 8 May 1974 (Offshore Technology Conference, Dallas, TX, 1974), pp. 791–810.
  • 6. I. R. Young, J. Wtrwy. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. ASCE 114, 637 (1988).
  • 7. S. A. Hsu, M. F. Martin Jr., B. W. Blanchard, J. Coastal Res. 16, 832 (2000).
  • 8. Supported by the Office of Naval Research as part of the NRL's basic research project "Slope to Shelf Energetics and Exchange Dynamics (SEED)" under program element 0601153N (NRL–Stennis Space Center contribution no. NRL/JA/7330–05–5172), by the Minerals Management Service Environmental Studies Program, and by the Minerals Management Service Technology Assessment and Research Program on Hurricane Ivan.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5736/896/DC1

Materials and Methods

Fig. S1


Received for publication 21 March 2005. Accepted for publication 8 July 2005.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Bottom-Up Determination of Air-Sea Momentum Exchange Under a Major Tropical Cyclone.
E. Jarosz, D. A. Mitchell, D. W. Wang, and W. J. Teague (2007)
Science 315, 1707-1709
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)