Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Invitrogen

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 1 July 2005:
Vol. 309. no. 5731, p. 94
DOI: 10.1126/science.309.5731.94

News

How Will Big Pictures Emerge From a Sea of Biological Data?

Elizabeth Pennisi

Biology is rich in descriptive data--and getting richer all the time. Large-scale methods of probing samples, such as DNA sequencing, microarrays, and automated gene-function studies, are filling new databases to the brim. Many subfields from biomechanics to ecology have gone digital, and as a result, observations are more precise and more plentiful. A central question now confronting virtually all fields of biology is whether scientists can deduce from this torrent of molecular data how systems and whole organisms work. All this information needs to be sifted, organized, compiled, and--most importantly--connected in a way that enables researchers to make predictions based on general principles.

Enter systems biology. Loosely defined and still struggling to find its way, this newly emerging approach aims to connect the dots that have emerged from decades of molecular, cellular, organismal, and even environmental observations. Its proponents seek to make biology more quantitative by relying on mathematics, engineering, and computer science to build a more rigid framework for linking disparate findings. They argue that it is the only way the field can move forward. And they suggest that biomedicine, particularly deciphering risk factors for disease, will benefit greatly.

The field got a big boost from the completion of the human genome sequence. The product of a massive, trip-to-the-moon logistical effort, the sequence is now a hard and fast fact. The biochemistry of human inheritance has been defined and measured. And that has inspired researchers to try to make other aspects of life equally knowable.

Molecular geneticists dream of having a similarly comprehensive view of networks that control genes: For example, they would like to identify rules explaining how a single DNA sequence can express different proteins, or varying amounts of protein, in different circumstances (see p. 80). Cell biologists would like to reduce the complex communication patterns traced by molecules that regulate the health of the cell to a set of signaling rules. Developmental biologists would like a comprehensive picture of how the embryo manages to direct a handful of cells into a myriad of specialized functions in bone, blood, and skin tissue. These hard puzzles can only be solved by systems biology, proponents say. The same can be said for neuroscientists trying to work out the emergent properties--higher thought, for example--hidden in complex brain circuits. To understand ecosystem changes, including global warming, ecologists need ways to incorporate physical as well as biological data into their thinking.

Figure 1 Systems approach. Circuit diagrams help clarify nerve cell functions.

CREDIT: MICHAEL T. SHIPLEY

Today, systems biologists have only begun to tackle relatively simple networks. They have worked out the metabolic pathway in yeast for breaking down galactose, a carbohydrate. Others have tracked the first few hours of the embryonic development of sea urchins and other organisms with the goal of seeing how various transcription factors alter gene expression over time. Researchers are also developing rudimentary models of signaling networks in cells and simple brain circuits.

Progress is limited by the difficulty of translating biological patterns into computer models. Network computer programs themselves are relatively simple, and the methods of portraying the results in ways that researchers can understand and interpret need improving. New institutions around the world are gathering interdisciplinary teams of biologists, mathematicians, and computer specialists to help promote systems biology approaches. But it is still in its early days.

No one yet knows whether intensive interdisciplinary work and improved computational power will enable researchers to create a comprehensive, highly structured picture of how life works.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A truer measure of our ignorance.
L. A. N. Amaral (2008)
PNAS 105, 6795-6796
   Full Text »    PDF »
Extracting the hierarchical organization of complex systems.
M. Sales-Pardo, R. Guimera, A. A. Moreira, and L. A. N. Amaral (2007)
PNAS 104, 15224-15229
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Bio-Ontology and text: bridging the modeling gap.
C. Friedman, T. Borlawsky, L. Shagina, H. R. Xing, and Y. A. Lussier (2006)
Bioinformatics 22, 2421-2429
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)