Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Comment on "Epitaxial BiFeO3 Multiferroic Thin Film Heterostructures"
Wang et al. (1) recently reported multiferroic behavior, withferromagnetic and ferroelectric polarizations that are bothlarge at room temperature, in thin strained films of BiFeO3(BFO). Although at room temperature, bulk BFO is ferroelectric(2) and anti-ferromagnetic (35), Wang et al. (1) reportedthat a 70-nm film shows both an enhanced ferroelectric polarization(90 µC cm2) and a substantial magnetization (1µB/Fe). This remains the only report of a robust room-temperaturemultiferroic and suggests the potential for novel devices thatexploit the anticipated strain-mediated magnetoelectric couplingbetween the two ordered ground states. In this Comment, we arguethat epitaxial strain does not enhance the magnetization andpolarization in BiFeO3.
Like Wang et al. (1), we grew BFO films on 50-nm underlayersof SrRuO3 (SRO) on SrTiO3 (001) substrates (STO). In addition,we used plain STO and conducting 0.2% atomic Nb-doped SrTiO3substrates (Nb-STO). Both BFO and SRO films were grown by pulsedlaser deposition with a KrF excimer laser (248 nm, 1 Hz, target-substratedistance = 8cm). BFO films were grown (670°C, 8 Pa O2, 1.6J cm2) using a Bi-rich target of Bi1.2FeO3, because Biis volatile (6). SRO films were grown (650°C, 9 Pa O2, 1.7J cm2) using a stoichiometric target. The growth ratefor both BFO and SRO was 10 Å/min. After deposition, filmswere cooled at 5°C/min to 400°C in 40 kPa oxygen, annealedfor 1 hour, and then cooled to room temperature at 8°C/min.
The crystalline quality of our films was investigated with high-resolutionx-ray diffraction (Fig. 1). The reciprocal space maps show thatthe BFO and SRO in-plane lattice parameters are equal to theSTO lattice parameter of 3.905 Å, consistent with coherentlystrained films. It should be noted that Wang et al. (1) performedtheir calculations of saturation polarization using the bulkSRO lattice parameter of 3.935 Å for the BFO inplane latticeparameter. In our work, BFO films as thin as 40 nm gave equivalentx-ray results, but 300-nm BFO films were found to be relaxed.All coherently strained films showed a root-mean-square surfaceroughness of 2 nm, as determined by atomic force microscopy.
Fig. 1.-2 scan of the (001) pseudocubic reflection for (A) BFO(80 nm)/Nb-STO and (B) BFO(90 nm)/SRO(50 nm)/STO. The corresponding reciprocal space maps of the (013) pseudocubic reflections are shown in (C) and (D). Reciprocal lattice units (rlu) Qx and Qy are equal to the inverse lattice spacing. All in-plane film lattice parameters can be seen to be equal to the STO lattice parameter of 3.905 Å. The BFO out-of-plane lattice parameter in both samples is 4.07 Å, and the corresponding value for SRO is 3.95 Å.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
BFO film stoichiometry was determined from quantitative energydispersive x-ray spectroscopy in a thick (400 nm) film grownat a laser repetition rate of 2 Hz. The Fe:Bi ratio was foundto be unity, within the error of the technique of a few percent.The Fe oxidation state was investigated for BFO/STO samplesgrown at 1 Hz and 2 Hz with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.All samples behaved similarly; a representative scan of theFe 2p line is shown in Fig. 2. The position of this line isexpected to be 711 eV for Fe3+ and 709.5 eV for Fe2+, and theposition of the satellite is expected at 719 eV for Fe3+ and716 eV for Fe2+ (7). From Fig. 2, we deduce that the oxidationstate of Fe in our BFO/STO films is Fe3+ and that there is noevidence for Fe2+ within a resolution of a few atomic percent.
To verify that our BFO films are insulating and ferroelectric,we performed piezoresponse microscopy (8) on BFO/Nb-STO andBFO/SRO/STO, and impedance spectroscopy using sputter-depositedPt on BFO/Nb-STO. The former technique confirmed ferroelectricswitching. The latter technique showed our films to be low-loss(2% loss tangent in 10 kHz to 1 MHz) and nonconducting (resistivity>1010cm). The high-temperature conductivity data showedan activation energy of 1.03 ± 0.05 eV, compatible withonly a small concentration of oxygen vacancies (9, 10). In agreementwith the literature (11), the effective dielectric constant(10 kHz to 1 MHz) was found to be 70 ± 2 at ambient temperature,increasing to 375 at 550 K.
Magnetic measurements were taken at room temperature with aPrinceton Measurements Corporation (Princeton, NJ) vibratingsample magnetometer. In Fig. 3, we plot saturation magnetizationMs as a function of BFO film thickness. BFO films both withand without the SRO underlayer behave similarly, which precludesany substantial magnetic contribution from SRO. All BFO filmsshow an essentially thickness-independent Ms that is less than0.06 µB/Fe, which rules out the strain-enhanced magnetizationinferred by Wang et al. (1). Indeed, strain should not modifyanti-ferromagnetic exchange interactions between singly occupiedFe3+3d orbitals. We note that density functional calculations(12) of unstrained BFO suggest a local magnetization of around0.05 µB/Fe, consistent with the findings presented here.
Fig. 3. Saturation magnetization Ms of BFO films versus film thickness. Black squares, BFO/STO; red circles, BFO/SRO(50 nm)/STO; blue triangle, BFO/Nb-STO. The inset shows a typical hysteresis loop. Magnetometer axis inplane and parallel to STO [100]. Before taking magnetic measurements, we used emery paper to grind away silver dag from the sides and undersides of the substrates to eliminate spurious magnetic signals that we attribute to material originating from the heater block.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The small Ms that we observed is reminiscent of bulk behavior(35). The large value observed by Wang et al. (1) couldarise as a result of a substantial Fe2+ fraction. If this fractionwere 50%, then Ms = 0.5 µB/Fe, and the composition wouldbe BiFeO2.75. However, this mixed-valent system with oxygenvacancies would be expected to possess an electrical resistivitythat is orders of magnitude lower than the figure of 109 cmstated in (1). In this scenario, the reported increase of polarizationwith decreasing film thickness (1) could be an experimentalartifact. Regarding the polarization (50 to 60 µC cm2)of the thicker (200 nm) films measured by Wang et al., althoughit is larger than the value recorded (2) in a poor-quality bulksample (6 µC cm2), it is, in effect, not epitaxiallyenhanced with respect to unstrained polycrystalline films (40µC cm2) (13). Therefore, we conclude that ferroelectricpolarization is not enhanced by strain in BFO films. Indeed,calculations that supersede those presented by Wang et al. show90 µC cm2 in unstrained BFO (14).
We conclude that an increased thickness-dependent magnetizationis not an intrinsic property of fully oxygenated and coherentlystrained epitaxial BFO films that exhibit a high electricalresistivity. If it is only possible to achieve substantial magnetizationvalues in deoxygenated BFO, then the applications potentialis reduced, because an increased electrical conductivity willbe detrimental to ferroelectric performance.
W. Eerenstein
Department of Materials Science University of Cambridge Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
F. D. Morrison
Department of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK
J. Dho
Department of Materials Science
M. G. Blamire
Department of Materials Science
J. F. Scott
Department of Earth Sciences
N. D. Mathur
Department of Materials Science
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: we212{at}cam.ac.uk
9. J. F. Scott, Ferroelectric Memories (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
10. S. Zafar, R. E. Jones, B. Jiang, B. White, P. Chu, D. Taylor, S. Gillespie, Appl. Phys. Lett.73, 175 (1998). [CrossRef]
11. M. Mahesh Kumar, V. R. Palkar, K. Srinivas, S. V. Suryanarayana, Appl. Phys. Lett.76, 2764 (2000). [CrossRef]
12. C. Ederer, N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B71, 060401 (2005). [CrossRef]
13. K. Y. Yun, M. Noda, M. Okuyama, Appl. Phys. Lett.83, 3981 (2003). [CrossRef]
14. J. B. Neaton, C. Ederer, U. V. Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, Phys. Rev. B71, 014113 (2005). [CrossRef]
15. We are grateful to A. Garg and Z. H. Barber for advice on bismuth-excess ablation targets; M. E. Vickers for help with the x-ray data; T. Hibma for x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy facilities in the Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; P. S. Roberts, M. Alexe, and C. Harnagea for help with piezoimaging; and N. A. Spaldin, C. Ederer, and R. Ramesh for helpful discussions. This work was funded by the Royal Society, the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, an EU Marie Curie Fellowship (W.E.), and a Korea Science and Engineering Foundation postdoctoral fellowship (J.D.).
Received for publication 7 July 2004. Accepted for publication 29 December 2004.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
J. Wang, A. Scholl, H. Zheng, S. B. Ogale, D. Viehland, D. G. Schlom, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, M. Wuttig, L. Mohaddes, J. Neaton, U. Waghmare, T. Zhao, and R. Ramesh (25 February 2005) Science307 (5713), 1203b.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1103959] |Full Text »|PDF »
REPORTS
J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng, V. Nagarajan, S. B. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V. Vaithyanathan, D. G. Schlom, U. V. Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, M. Wuttig, and R. Ramesh (14 March 2003) Science299 (5613), 1719.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1080615] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »|Supporting Online Material »