Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Science Signaling - Call For Papers

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 July 2003:
Vol. 301. no. 5629, p. 49
DOI: 10.1126/science.1083647

Technical Comments

Comment on "A Green Algal Apicoplast Ancestor"

Discovery of a plastid in apicomplexan parasites such as Toxoplasma and Plasmodium (1, 2) has prompted intense debate over whether the plastid originates from a red algal or a green algal ancestor (35). Funes et al. (6) argued for a green algal ancestry based on analysis of the cox2 gene, which encodes COXII, a subunit of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain). Apicomplexan parasites are unusual in that COXII is encoded in the nucleus (7). In all other organisms studied, with the notable exceptions of certain green algae and leguminous plants, COXII is encoded by the mitochondrial genome (8, 9). Intriguingly, the COXII protein of apicomplexan parasites comprises two polypeptides corresponding to the NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal domains of the canonical COXII. The two domains are encoded by two nuclear genes, cox2a and cox2b (7). This gene separation also occurs in certain green algae, where it appears that the cox2 gene split in the mitochondrial DNA before cox2a and cox2b transferred to the nucleus (6). Funes et al. (6) presented a phylogeny of COXII indicating that apicomplexan genes are most closely related to the cox2 genes of green algae. They further suggested that apicomplexa acquired their split cox2a and cox2b genes through lateral gene transfer (presumably nucleus to nucleus) from the endosymbiotic (green) alga that gave rise to the plastid.

We reanalyzed COXII phylogeny to include the mitochondrion-encoded COXII proteins of ciliates. Ciliates are crucial to the interpretation of COXII phylogeny because they are closely related to apicomplexa (together with dinoflagellates, ciliates and apicomplexa form the protist supergroup alveolates), but were not included by Funes et al. (6). If apicomplexan cox2 genes were inherited vertically (the null hypothesis) and not acquired laterally from a green algal endosymbiont, then they should be related to ciliate homologues. COXII phylogenies including ciliates indeed show that the apicomplexan cox2a and cox2b genes group with the ciliate cox2 genes (Fig. 1A). However, COXII data provide poor overall phylogenetic resolution [as with the Funes et al. analysis (6), there is very little support at the phylum level], and the ciliate genes are remarkably divergent. Still, this tree is consistent with simple, vertical inheritance of cox2 in alveolates, and therefore provides no grounds to reject the null hypothesis in favor of lateral transfer of cox2a and cox2b from a green alga. It is thus possible that the cox2 gene underwent independent splitting and relocation from the mitochondrion to the nucleus after the ancestor of ciliates and apicomplexa diverged.


 Fig 1. Analysis of COX II. (A) Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis (17) including ciliate sequences. Bootstrap support >50% for ML (above) and Fitch-Margoliash (below) analyses is indicated for major nodes. The phylogeny groups apicomplexans with ciliates, consistent with vertical inheritance (rather than lateral gene transfer) of the COXII coding sequence in apicomplexa (19). (B) Mesohydrophobicity (<H>60-80) versus maximal local hydrophobicity (<H>17) plot of COXII proteins from the phylogeny (20). Circles indicate intact COXII proteins encoded in the mitochondrion. Diamonds and triangles indicate split COXII proteins, which (except for S. obliquus COXIIA, indicated with a cross) are nucleus-encoded and imported into the mitochondrion. Split COXII proteins cluster away from their intact mitochondrion-encoded counterparts. (C) Schematic of COXII protein forms. [View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
 

Funes et al. argued that parallel transfer of cox2 to the nucleus is unlikely (6), but it clearly happened twice—for green algae and the legumes (8, 9)—and the phylogeny in Fig. 1A is consistent with a third transfer in an ancestor of apicomplexan parasites. The mitochondrial genome of apicomplexans is the smallest known and encodes a mere three proteins (10), a fact that suggests heavy gene loss accompanied by gene transfer to the nucleus. One factor proposed to limit relocation of genes from organelles to the nucleus is hydrophobicity of the encoded protein. If a gene product is too hydrophobic to undergo retrograde targeting to the organelle, relocation of the gene is not feasible (11, 12). COXII is a hydrophobic membrane protein, and organisms containing nuclear cox2 genes appear to have conceived two mechanisms for solving the hydrophobicity problem. One is a hydrophilic shift in the sequence of the protein, with certain legumes having a single nuclear cox2 gene that encodes a relatively hydrophilic COXII protein (12). The second mechanism entails splitting proteins into smaller modules that are more amenable to transport (1113), which appears to be the case with cox2a and cox2b. Analysis of protein hydrophobicity shows that, in comparison with mitochondrion-encoded COXII proteins, the split COXII proteins of apicomplexans obey a defined trend of reduced hydrophobic characters that are necessary for mitochondrial import (Fig. 1B) (11). Thus, in view of the highly reduced mitochondrial genome in apicomplexans, we believe that independent splitting and relocation of cox2 has occurred. Interestingly, ciliate COXII proteins, which are unusually hydrophilic for mitochondrion-encoded COXII (Fig. 1B), contain a 300-amino-acid insertion exactly where the apicomplexan COXII is split (Fig. 1C)—which demonstrates that this region of the protein is amenable to alterations. Protein plasticity at this site in alveolates further bolsters the likelihood of a convergent cox2 split rather than lateral transfers of the split gene from a putative green algal endosymbiont.

The only other support for a green algal ancestry of the apicoplast is the phylogeny of plastid tufA, but the support for this phylogeny is weak (3). In contrast, several independent lines of evidence point to a red algal origin of the apicomplexan plastid based on structural characteristics of the plastid genome and on a shared gene duplication of a nucleus-encoded, plastid-targeted protein (1416). Indeed, the apicomplexa are related to a number of other lineages with red algal plastids, so this conclusion should not come as a surprise.

Ross F. Waller
Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology
University of Melbourne
Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

Patrick J. Keeling
Department of Botany
University of British Columbia
3529-6270 University Boulevard
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Giel G. van Dooren
Geoffrey I. McFadden*

Plant Cell Biology Research Centre
School of Botany
University of Melbourne


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gim{at}unimelb.edu.au


References and Notes

  • 1. R. J. M. Wilson et al., J. Mol. Biol. 261, 155 (1996). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
  • 2. G. I. McFadden, R. Reith, J. Munholland, N. Lang-Unnasch, Nature 381, 482 (1996). [CrossRef] [Medline]
  • 3. S. Köhler et al., Science 275, 1485 (1997).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 4. G. I. McFadden, Nature 400, 119 (1999). [CrossRef] [Medline]
  • 5. J. D. Palmer, J. Phycol. 39, 4 (2003). [CrossRef] [ISI]
  • 6. S. Funes et al., Science 298, 2155 (2002).[Free Full Text]
  • 7. M. J. Gardner et al., Nature 419, 498 (2002). [CrossRef] [Medline]
  • 8. M. W. Gray, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 678 (1999). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
  • 9. J. D. Palmer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 6960 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 10. J. E. Feagin, M. J. Gardner, D. H. Williamson, R. J. Wilson, J. Protozool. 38, 243 (1991). [Medline]
  • 11. M. G. Claros et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 762 (1995). [ISI] [Medline]
  • 12. D. O. Daley, R. Clifton, J. Whelan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 10510 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 13. J. M. Herrmann, H. Koll, R. A. Cook, W. Neupert, R. A. Stuart, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27079 (1995).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 14. G. I. McFadden, R. F. Waller, Bioessays 19, 1033 (1997). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
  • 15. J. L. Blanchard, J. S. Hicks, J. Euk. Micro. 46, 367 (1999). [CrossRef]
  • 16. N. M. Fast, J. C. Kissinger, D. S. Roos, P. J. Keeling, Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 418 (2001).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 17. Protein maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny was inferred using ProML [Felsenstein, J. 2002. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6a3] with site-to-site rate variation modeled with 6 variable rate categories and invariable sites. Rates and frequencies were estimated using TREE-PUZZLE 5.0 (18). Gamma-corrected distances were calculated using TREE-PUZZLE and Fitch-Margoliash trees inferred using FITCH.
  • 18. K. Strimmer, A. von Haeseler, Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 964 (1996). [ISI]
  • 19. A putative common intron is used as a further phylogenetic marker by Funes et al. (6). However, this intron occurs in the poorly conserved 5'-region of cox2a, which cannot be reliably aligned. Moreover, the intron is present in only one of several apicomplexan taxa. It is more likely an independently acquired intron in T. gondii, and therefore not useful for this study.
  • 20. Protein mesohydrophobicity (average regional hydrophobicity over a 60- to 80-residue window) and maximal local hydrophobicity (over 17 residues) were calculated with Mitoprot (21) using the GES hydrophobicity scale (22).
  • 21. M. G. Claros, P. Vincens, Eur. J. Biochem. 241, 779 (1996). [ISI] [Medline]
  • 22. D. M. Engelman, T. A. Steitz, A. Goldman, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 15, 321 (1986). [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
Received for publication 19 February 2003. Accepted for publication 8 May 2003.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Evolution of the Glucose-6-Phosphate Isomerase: The Plasticity of Primary Metabolism in Photosynthetic Eukaryotes.
C. Grauvogel, H. Brinkmann, and J. Petersen (2007)
Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1611-1621
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)