Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Technical Comments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is more likely that the observations of Chabas et al. (5) and others (6-9) resulted from one or several polymorphic genes derived from strain 129 and linked to the OPN locus. In these experiments--in which mixed or incompletely backcrossed 129/B6 mice containing homozygous OPN or homozygous "wild type" were used--a large and unidentified fragment on chromosome 5, derived from 129 and containing a deleted OPN gene, was compared with a corresponding fragment from B6. Thus, any polymorphic genes in this fragment, which contained thousands of genes, could be of importance. Indeed, several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been observed on chromosome 5 in linkage studies of Lyme arthritis (14) and EAE (15). In addition, a gene within an earlier-defined QTL in a homologous region in rats has recently been cloned that dramatically affects the severity of arthritis and EAE (16). This region has also long been known to control traits like resistance to Rickettsia infection, and the polymorphism of the associated haplotype has been found to vary extensively among strains (17). Thus, this region--as is probable with most parts of the genome--contains many polymorphic genes that can potentially have an important influence on inflammatory diseases. A list of some closely linked polymorphic genes that potentially could influence an inflammatory response is provided in Table 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are several difficulties in using knockout mice in providing conclusive evidence for genes in disease traits, like the role of OPN in inflammatory diseases. A common pitfall is when wild-type mice and not littermates are used as controls: In that situation, any gene in the genome that differs between the embryonic stem (ES) cell and the backcrossed parental cell may play a role. Preferably, heterozygous littermates should be included, because dominant genes in the linked fragment will be neutralized. However, a recessive effect closely linked to the gene of interest is almost impossible to exclude if the knockout is created with ES cells of a different genotype than in the mouse used later in the study. In addition, a parental strain 129 control is not proper as a control for many different reasons. The origins of 129 strains vary and are most likely different from those of the abnormal strain that grows from a somatically mutated ES cell line that has been adapted for growth in a laboratory. Furthermore, it is well known that isolated congenic fragments will control traits different from their role in the parentals because of interactions with the rest of the genome, as well as through splitting of selected gene pairs in the borders of the congenic fragments. Therefore, it is of general and crucial importance to identify the naturally selected polymorphisms controlling the diseases or traits of interest.
We emphasize that we do not question an important and potential role of OPN in various biological contexts (1, 2). The role for OPN in inflammatory disease is still an open issue. The lack of effect in the OPN-deleted mouse is most likely explained by the influence of other genes that may replace the role of OPN. Identifying the OPN-linked polymorphic genes that exert a strong influence on arthritis and encephalomyelitis therefore represents a challenging and important task.
Thomas Blom
Department of Medical
Inflammation Research
Lund
University
Sölvegatan 19
Lund 22184, Sweden
Ahnders Franzén
Dick Heinegård
Department of Connective Tissue Biology
Lund University
Rikard Holmdahl
Department of
Medical
Inflammation Research
Lund University
| 1. |
F. P. Reinholt,
K. Hultenby,
A. Oldberg,
D. Heinegard,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
87,
4473
(1990)
|
| 2. | D. T. Denhardt and M. Noda, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 31, 92 (1998) . |
| 3. |
S. Ashkar,
et al.,
Science
287,
860
(2000)
|
| 4. |
A. W. O'Regan,
et al.,
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med.
164,
2243
(2001)
|
| 5. |
D. Chabas,
et al.,
Science
294,
1731
(2001)
|
| 6. |
M. Sakata,
et al.,
J. Rheumatol.
28,
1492
(2001)
|
| 7. | S. Ohshima, et al., Arthritis Rheum. 46, 1094 (2002) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 8. |
K. Yumoto,
et al.,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
99,
4556
(2002)
|
| 9. |
M. Jansson,
V. Panoutsakopoulou,
J. Baker,
L. Klein,
H. Cantor,
J. Immunol.
168,
2096
(2002)
|
| 10. | K. B. Abdul-Majid, et al., J. Neuroimmunol. 111, 23 (2000) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 11. | K. Gustafsson, M. Karlsson, L. Andersson, R. Holmdahl, Eur. J. Immunol. 20, 2127 (1990) [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 12. |
A. C. Johansson,
A. S. Hansson,
K. S. Nandakumar,
J. Backlund,
R. Holmdahl,
J. Immunol.
167,
3505
(2001)
|
| 13. | S. R. Rittling, et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 13, 1101 (1998) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 14. |
M. R. Potter,
et al.,
Infect. Immun.
70,
1372
(2002)
|
| 15. |
J. Karlsson,
et al.,
J. Immunol.
170,
1019
(2003)
|
| 16. | P. Olofsson, et al., Nature Genet. 33, 25 (2003) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 17. |
T. R. Jerrells and
J. V. Osterman,
Infect. Immun.
31,
1014
(1981)
|
| 18. | B. H. Cochran, A. C. Reffel, C. D. Stiles, Cell 33, 939 (1983) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 19. | A. R. Glabinski, V. K. Tuohy, R. M. Ransohoff, Neuroimmunomodulation 5, 166 (1998) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 20. |
P. Tekamp-Olson,
et al.,
J. Exp. Med.
172,
911
(1990)
|
| 21. | A. Wuyts, et al., J. Immunol. 157, 1736 (1996) [Abstract]. |
| 22. |
D. L. Rossi,
et al.,
J. Immunol.
162,
5490
(1999)
|
| 23. |
J. B. Smith and
H. R. Herschman,
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16756
(1995)
|
| 24. |
M. R. Horton,
et al.,
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
35088
(1998)
|
| 25. |
J. M. Farber,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
87,
5238
(1990)
|
| 26. | C. S. Tannenbaum, T. J. Koerner, M. M. Jansen, T. A. Hamilton, J. Immunol. 140, 3640 (1988) [Abstract]. |
| 27. | M. E. Dickinson et al., Genomics 6, 505 (Mar 1990). |
| 28. | C. Faucheux, F. Ulysse, R. Bareille, A. H. Reddi, J. Amedee, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 241, 787 (1997) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 29. | M. M. Dickie, Mouse Newslett. 29, 39 (1963) . |
| 30. | K. Ozawa, T. Uruno, K. Miyakawa, M. Seo, T. Imamura, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 41, 279 (1996) [Medline]. |
| 31. |
K. Oritani and
P. W. Kincade,
J. Cell Biol.
134,
771
(1996)
|
| 32. |
K. Oritani,
et al.,
Blood
90,
3404
(1997)
|
| 33. |
L. Peleg and
M. N. Nesbitt,
J. Hered.
75,
126
(1984)
|
| 34. | L. Xia, et al., J. Clin. Invest. 109, 939 (2002) [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]. |
| 35. |
J. Yang,
J. Galipeau,
C. A. Kozak,
B. C. Furie,
B. Furie,
Blood
87,
4176
(1996)
|
| 36. |
L. Velazquez,
et al.,
J. Exp. Med.
195,
1599
(2002)
|
| 37. |
S. Takaki,
et al.,
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14562
(1997)
|
| 38. |
C. R. Lyons,
G. J. Orloff,
J. M. Cunningham,
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6370
(1992)
|
| 39. |
G. T. De Sanctis,
et al.,
J. Exp. Med.
189,
1621
(1999)
|
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)