Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Technical Comments
|
| 1. |
J. L. Betancourt,
C. Latorre,
J. A. Rech,
J. Quade,
K. A. Rylander,
Science
289,
1542
(2000)
|
| 2. | M. Grosjean, et al., Quat. Res. 48, 239 (1997) . |
| 3. | M. Grosjean et al., Global Planet. Change 28, 23 (2001) |
| 4. | B. Valero-Garcés et al., J. Paleoclim. 16, 1 (1996). |
| 5. | L. G. Thompson et al., Science 282, 1858 (1998). |
| 6. | M. Abbott et al., Quat. Res. 48, 70 (1997). |
| 7. | P. A. Baker et al., Science, 291, 640 (2001). |
| 8. | M. Geyh, et al., Quat. Res. 52, 143 (1999) . |
| 9. | T. K. Lowenstein, unpublished data. |
| 10. | B. Messerli et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 19, 459 (2000). |
| 11. | D. Sandweiss, personal communication. |
| 12. | Supported by Swiss NF 20-056908.99. Comments by C. Rigsby, P. Baker, T. Lowenstein, and D. Sandweiss are gratefully acknowledged. |
Response: Grosjean does not take issue with the evidence in our study (1) from wetland deposits for elevated water tables or with their dating. Less clear, according to Grosjean, are the causes of the water table rise or how regionally consistent--and therefore climatically driven--the changes in water table elevation have been. These issues were the focus of considerable debate at a recent workshop on the central Andean paleoclimate (2).
The wetland evidence for high water tables during the late Pleistocene and mid-Holocene is more widespread and in more diverse geomorphic settings than is implied in the simple scheme portrayed by Grosjean. In the central Atacama, wetland deposits date from ~8.0 to 3.0 ky B.P. at Rio Tulán; 6.8 to 4.0 ky B.P. at Rio Salado; >4.5 to 3.0 ky B.P. at Rio Loa; and 6.5 to 3.0 ky B.P. at Quebrada Puripica (3). Mid-Holocene deposits are not confined to the canyon narrows at Rio Tulán, as suggested by Grosjean, but occur both within small channels and on interfluves outside of the mainstem channel. Mid-Holocene deposits are located in open, marshy environments in the Calama depositional basin (Rio Salado and Rio Loa) and around spring vents to the north, such as Zapahuita Springs at 18°S (3). In contrast, late glacial-early Holocene deposits crop out in deep, erosive canyons to the south (Quebrada Chaco, 25°S) and north (Quebrada la Higuera, 18°S). The consistency of the wetland ages across this broad spectrum of geomorphic settings suggests to us that regional hydrology and climate--not the complex local factors suggested by Grosjean--control wetland distribution.
In our view, the height of the water table in these hydrologic systems is the main control on the wetland deposition, and water table height is directly related to ground-water recharge in the Andes. When water tables were high, thick phreatophytic vegetation protected the soft wetland sediments from erosion. When water tables dropped and vegetation died, water and wind quickly eroded the deposits, as occurs in the area today. Channel filling by alluvial sediment cannot be the mechanism for raising water tables across the region, insofar as many wetland deposits are composed of diatomite and organic mats, not alluvium.
The evidence for mid-Holocene aridity in the Atacama is equivocal. Grosjean has proposed that ~30-m-thick diatomites at Quebrada Puripica are lake deposits dammed behind a side-canyon debris flow during the period of mid-Holocene aridity (4). The presence of diatomites for several kilometers above and below the suggested side-canyon dam clearly demands a different explanation for their development (5). The core from Lake Miscanti contains gypsum from a depth of ~2.0 to 3.75 m, but the dating of the core entails large and variable 14C reservoir corrections, making the true age of the gypsum layer uncertain (6). Those studying the Salar de Atacama core view the shift from salt pan to saline lake during the mid-Holocene as induced by climate (7), not by local tectonic effects as suggested by Grosjean.
In the final analysis, Grosjean accepts the evidence from wetlands and middens for increased late Pleistocene and early Holocene wetness, which agrees with his own lake studies, but rejects similar evidence for the mid-Holocene, which conflicts with those studies.
Jay Quade
Jason Rech
Desert Laboratory
University of Arizona
1675 West Anklam
Road
Tucson, AZ 85745, USA
E-mail: jquade{at}geo.arizona.edu
Julio Betancourt
U.S. Geological Survey
1675 West Anklam Road
Tucson, AZ 85745, USA
Claudio Latorre
Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Chile
| 1. | J. L. Betancourt, C. Latorre, J. A. Rech, J. Quade, K. A. Rylander, Science 289, 1542 (2000) . |
| 2. | Proceedings, PEPI Workshop on the Paleoclimatology of the Central Andes, Tucson, Arizona, 11 to 16 January 2001 (published online at www.paztcn.wt.usgs.gov/pcaw). |
| 3. | J. A. Rech et al., in Proceedings, PEPI Workshop on the Paleoclimatology of the Central Andes, Tucson, Arizona, 11 to 16 January 2001 (published online at www.paztcn.wt.usgs.gov/pcaw), A-38. |
| 4. | M. Grosjean, et al., Quat. Res. 48, 239 (1997) . |
| 5. | J. A. Rech et al., Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 32, 7, A-274 (2000). |
| 6. | M. Grosjean, et al., Global Planet. Change 28, 35 (2001) . |
| 7. | A. L. Bobst et al., Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., in press. |