Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Click Me!

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 18 December 1998:
Vol. 282. no. 5397, p. 2151
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2151a

Technical Comments

The Hippocampus and Human Navigation


Eleanor A. Maguire et al. (1) used positron emission tomography (PET) to scan the brains of humans while they navigated in a familiar virtual reality town. Maguire et al. observed activation in several brain regions of the volunteers performing the task, and they concluded that accurate navigation is associated with activation of the right hippocampus. These findings are in line with mammalian studies of hippocampal function, particularly the discovery (shared by one of the authors of the report, J. O'Keefe) of place cells in the rodent hippocampus (2). It appears, however, that the activation ascribed to the hippocampus in the report (1) as shown in figures 1B and 2B of (1), is primarily outside the hippocampus. Although the edge of the activated region may include the subiculum, the activation shown on the average magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the actual subjects is in the parahippocampal cortex and fusiform gyrus. The Talairach (3) stereotactic coordinates supplied by Maguire et al. (1) for the presumed peak activation of the right hippocampus are outside the hippocampus as well. Recent functional MRI studies have reported parahippocampal activity associated with navigational tasks in humans (4, 5); another study demonstrated selective activation of an area of the parahippocampal gyrus by visual spatial scenes that depict places (6). The distinction between the hippocampus and its neighboring structures--perirhinal cortex, entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus--is important, because these areas are functionally different, as shown by lesion experiments in primates (7).

Also, the region identified in figure 1B in the report as the left tail of the caudate is in fact in the corona radiata as it converges to form the internal capsule. This region lies between the caudate and the insula, according to the MRI depiction and the Talairach coordinates given in the report. It could be argued that the proximity to the caudate is within the spatial resolution limits of the method, but if so, then consideration should be given to interpretation of the data as activation of the insula.

Itzhak Fried
Division of Neurosurgery,
University of California School of Medicine
Los Angeles, CA 90095-7039, USA
E-mail: fried{at}surgery.medsch.ucla.edu

REFERENCES

  1. E. A. Maguire, et al., Science 280, 921 (1998) [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
  2. J. O'Keefe and J. Dostrovsky, Brain Res. 34, 171 (1971) [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline] .
  3. J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 1988).
  4. G. K. Aguirre, J. A. Detre, D. C. Alsop, M. D'Esposito, Cerebral Cortex 6, 823 (1996).
  5. G. K. Aguirre and M. D'Esposito, J. Neurosci. 17, 2512 (1997).
  6. R. Epstein and N. Kanwisher, Nature 392, 598 (1998) [CrossRef] [Medline] .
  7. S. Zola-Morgan, L. Squire, S. Ramus, Hippocampus 4, 483 (1994) [CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline] .
29 June 1998; accepted 16 November 1998

Response: Fried raises two issues: the loca- tion of the hippocampal activations reported in our report (1) in relation to the Talairach and Tournoux (2) brain, and the location of the hippocampal activations on the figures as shown in our report. While the Talairach and Tournoux x, y, and z coordinate system was used to locate the voxels of peak activation in our study, the Talairach and Tournoux brain was not. Instead, the scans of volunteers' brains were normalized with reference to the Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) template brain (3) (based on 305 normal brains), as we describe in note 7 of our report (1). These brains are different, with the Talairach and Tournoux brain being smaller and less precisely characterized as compared with the MNI template. Thus, although our locations of peak activation are within the hippocampal formation when correctly referenced to the MNI template (CA1 or subiculum, Fig. 1), if inappropriately plotted on the smaller Talairach and Tournoux brain, they appear to be extra-hippocampal.


Fig. 1. Cross-hairs show the location of the peaks of activity for the two relevant activations on the MNI template brain. Right medial temporal region is featured with cross-hairs located at the closest structural slice to the activation peaks. Peak activation falls within the CA1 or subicular regions of the hippocampal formation. (A and B) Coronal and sagittal views, respectively. Successful navigation by following arrows. x = 30, y = -16, and z = -22; shown at x = 30, y = -15, and z = -21. (C and D) Coronal and sagittal views, respectively. Correlation: accuracy/rCBF. x = 36, y = -12, and z = -20; Shown at x = 36, y = -12, and z = -21. [View Larger Version of this Image (100K GIF file)]

We appreciate Fried's concern about the lack of clarity afforded by displaying activations on a structural image averaged across the ten subjects, where medial temporal structures are difficult to visualize. Nevertheless, the peak activations as shown on the MNI template brain can be observed in the right hippocampal formation (Fig. 1). In the case of both activations, our discussion was focused on the location of the peaks of activity. In the case of the categorical comparison (successful navigation-arrows), the spread of the activation undoubtedly includes parahippocampal cortex as Fried suggests; however, the peak is in the hippocampal formation. In the case of the correlation between accuracy of navigation and rCBF, the activation remains within the hippocampal formation. Finally, the activations we reported (1) were definitely in the hippocampal formation as compared with the activation observed by Epstein and Kanwisher (4) that Fried mentions. The activation they observed in their study (4)--which called for volunteers to perform a passive, 2-dimensional scenes task--was at least 3 cm posterior in the brain to the activation that we observed (1) while our volunteers performed an active, 3-dimensional navigation task.

Eleanor A. Maguire*
Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology,
Institute of Neurology,
University College London,
12 Queen Square,
London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
E-mail: emaguire{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  1. E. A. Maguire, et al., Science 280, 921 (1998) .
  2. J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 1988).
  3. A. C. Evans et al., in Proceedings of the IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, San Francisco, CA, 31 October to 6 November 1993, L. A. Klaisner, Ed. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 1993), pp. 1813-1817.
  4. R. Epstein and N. Kanwisher, Nature 392, 598 (1998) .
14 July 1998; accepted 16 November 1998





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)