Related Content
Search Google Scholar for:
More Information
Related Jobs from ScienceCareers
|
|
Science 18 December 1998: Vol. 282. no. 5397, p. 2151 DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2151a
|
|
Technical Comments
The Hippocampus and Human Navigation
Eleanor A. Maguire et al. (1)
used positron emission tomography (PET) to scan the brains of humans
while they navigated in a familiar virtual reality town. Maguire
et al. observed activation in several brain regions of the
volunteers performing the task, and they concluded that accurate
navigation is associated with activation of the right hippocampus.
These findings are in line with mammalian studies of hippocampal
function, particularly the discovery (shared by one of the authors of
the report, J. O'Keefe) of place cells in the rodent hippocampus
(2). It appears, however, that the activation ascribed to
the hippocampus in the report (1) as shown in figures 1B and
2B of (1), is primarily outside the hippocampus. Although
the edge of the activated region may include the subiculum, the
activation shown on the average magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the
actual subjects is in the parahippocampal cortex and fusiform gyrus.
The Talairach (3) stereotactic coordinates supplied by
Maguire et al. (1) for the presumed peak
activation of the right hippocampus are outside the hippocampus as
well. Recent functional MRI studies have reported
parahippocampal activity associated with navigational tasks
in humans (4, 5); another study demonstrated selective
activation of an area of the parahippocampal gyrus by visual spatial
scenes that depict places (6). The distinction between the
hippocampus and its neighboring structures--perirhinal cortex,
entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus--is important, because
these areas are functionally different, as shown by lesion experiments
in primates (7).
Also, the region identified in figure 1B in the report as the
left tail of the caudate is in fact in the corona radiata as it
converges to form the internal capsule. This region lies between the caudate and the insula, according to the MRI depiction and the
Talairach coordinates given in the report. It could be argued that the
proximity to the caudate is within the spatial resolution limits of the
method, but if so, then consideration should be given to interpretation
of the data as activation of the insula.
Itzhak Fried
Division of Neurosurgery, University of California School of Medicine Los Angeles, CA 90095-7039, USA E-mail: fried{at}surgery.medsch.ucla.edu
REFERENCES
-
E. A. Maguire,
et al.,
Science
280,
921
(1998)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
-
J. O'Keefe and
J. Dostrovsky,
Brain Res.
34,
171
(1971)
[CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
.
-
J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic
Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany,
1988).
-
G. K. Aguirre, J. A. Detre, D. C. Alsop, M. D'Esposito,
Cerebral Cortex 6, 823 (1996).
-
G. K. Aguirre and M. D'Esposito, J. Neurosci.
17, 2512 (1997).
-
R. Epstein and
N. Kanwisher,
Nature
392,
598
(1998)
[CrossRef] [Medline]
.
-
S. Zola-Morgan,
L. Squire,
S. Ramus,
Hippocampus
4,
483
(1994)
[CrossRef] [ISI] [Medline]
.
29 June 1998; accepted 16 November
1998
Response: Fried raises two issues: the loca- tion
of the hippocampal activations reported in our report (1) in relation to the Talairach and Tournoux (2) brain, and the
location of the hippocampal activations on the figures as shown in our
report. While the Talairach and Tournoux x, y, and z coordinate system was used to locate the voxels of
peak activation in our study, the Talairach and Tournoux brain was not.
Instead, the scans of volunteers' brains were normalized with
reference to the Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) template
brain (3) (based on 305 normal brains), as we describe in
note 7 of our report (1). These brains are different, with
the Talairach and Tournoux brain being smaller and less precisely
characterized as compared with the MNI template. Thus, although our
locations of peak activation are within the hippocampal formation when
correctly referenced to the MNI template (CA1 or subiculum,
Fig. 1), if inappropriately plotted on the smaller Talairach and
Tournoux brain, they appear to be extra-hippocampal.
Fig. 1.
Cross-hairs show the location of
the peaks of activity for the two relevant activations on the MNI
template brain. Right medial temporal region is featured with
cross-hairs located at the closest structural slice to the activation
peaks. Peak activation falls within the CA1 or subicular regions of the
hippocampal formation. (A and B) Coronal and
sagittal views, respectively. Successful navigation by
following arrows. x = 30, y = 16, and
z = 22; shown at x = 30, y = 15, and z = 21.
(C and D) Coronal and sagittal views,
respectively. Correlation: accuracy/rCBF. x = 36, y = 12, and z = 20; Shown at x = 36, y = 12, and z = 21.
[View Larger Version of this Image (100K GIF file)]
We appreciate Fried's concern about the lack of clarity afforded
by displaying activations on a structural image averaged across the ten
subjects, where medial temporal structures are difficult to visualize.
Nevertheless, the peak activations as shown on the MNI template brain
can be observed in the right hippocampal formation (Fig.
1). In the case of both activations, our discussion was focused on the location of the peaks of activity. In the
case of the categorical comparison (successful navigation-arrows), the
spread of the activation undoubtedly includes parahippocampal cortex as
Fried suggests; however, the peak is in the hippocampal formation. In
the case of the correlation between accuracy of navigation and
rCBF, the activation remains within the hippocampal formation.
Finally, the activations we reported (1) were definitely in
the hippocampal formation as compared with the activation observed by
Epstein and Kanwisher (4) that Fried mentions. The
activation they observed in their study (4)--which called for volunteers to perform a
passive, 2-dimensional scenes task--was at least 3 cm posterior in the
brain to the activation that we observed (1) while our
volunteers performed an active, 3-dimensional navigation
task.
Eleanor A. Maguire*
Wellcome
Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of
Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London
WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom E-mail: emaguire{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
REFERENCES AND NOTES
-
E. A. Maguire,
et al.,
Science
280,
921
(1998)
.
-
J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic
Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany,
1988).
-
A. C. Evans et al., in
Proceedings of the IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical
Imaging Conference, San Francisco, CA, 31 October to 6 November
1993, L. A. Klaisner, Ed. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 1993), pp. 1813-1817.
-
R. Epstein and
N. Kanwisher,
Nature
392,
598
(1998)
.
14 July 1998; accepted 16 November 1998
|
|