Related Content
Search Google Scholar for:
More Information
Related Jobs from ScienceCareers
|
|
Science 6 February 1998: Vol. 279. no. 5352, p. 779 DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5352.779a
|
|
Technical Comments
Organic Shielding of Greenhouse Gases on Early Earth
Carl Sagan and Christopher F. Chyba (1) propose
that particulates of organic polymers (tholins) were produced by
ultraviolet (UV) light high in a primitive Earth atmosphere with
CO2/CH4 < 1. Suspended in the stratosphere,
the particulates would protect CH4 and NH3
below the haze layer from UV photolysis, thus allowing for an enhanced
early greenhouse. This proposal is designed to resolve the conflict
between the low luminosity of the early sun and the geological evidence
for liquid water on the primitive Earth. The atmosphere proposed by
Sagan and Chyba (1) has many logical consequences, several
of which we point out here.
Photodecomposition of CH4 and NH3 has been the
main criticism of a strongly reducing early Earth atmosphere
(2). The atmosphere proposed by Sagan and Chyba is similar
to that proposed by Oparin (3) and by Urey (4)
and simulated in prebiotic electric discharge experiments producing
amino acids (5). Yellow-brown tholins are also produced
efficiently in spark discharge experiments, but these are mostly water
soluble in contrast to compounds produced high in the atmosphere in the
relative absence of water.
It has been proposed (6) that an early atmosphere of
~10 bar of CO2 was significant in aerobraking incoming
comets, thus reducing the comet impact velocities sufficiently that
cometary organics might have survived the impact. The requirement of
CO2 < CH4 for efficient tholin production
precludes the existance of an extensive CO2 atmosphere,
suggesting that aerobraking was not as important as previously
maintained (6). In contrast, the efficiency of delivery of
organics by interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) might be higher as a
result of the reducing atmosphere because there would be less oxidation
of organics liberated during ablative heating of IDPs. Because the
CH4 in the atmosphere proposed by Sagan and Chyba
(1) has an endogenous source (that is, mid-ocean ridge
vents), there is no role for exogenous sources of CH4 and other organic compounds (6, 8).
The UV protection needed for NH3 in the lower atmosphere
diminishes the role of UV light as an energy source for prebiotic synthesis in the lower atmosphere. Thus, prebiotic syntheses employing hot hydrogen atoms (9) or CH4 photolysis
fragments (10) would be restricted to regions of the
stratosphere above the haze layer. The formation of HCN could still
occur by reaction of N with CH3 and
3CH2, but the survival of HCN against
photolysis at H Ly (121.6 nm) will only occur below the haze layer;
shielding by CO2 is unimportant for CO2 ~
present-day levels (11). Thus, the amount of HCN delivered
to the oceans is dependent on how quickly HCN is transported below the
haze layer. The formation of H2CO in the troposphere
(12) would most likely be lower as a result of a reduction
in H2O and CO2 photolysis below the haze. More generally, below the haze layer, lightning and corona discharge would
be the dominant energy sources for prebiotic syntheses, even though UV
(<250 nm) is at least a factor of 100 times greater in energy flux
than are electric discharges.
Central to the feasibility of the model by Sagan and Chyba
(1) is an adequate source of CH4. They assume
that most of the C outgassed from the oceanic vents was
CH4. At present, the CO2 to CH4
ratio is ~100 to 1 for the vents (14), corresponding to an
apparent equilibrium of the reaction CO2 + 4H2 = CH4 + 2H2O at 500°C and 500 bars
(7), assuming the quartz-fayalite-magnatite (QFM) buffer.
The present oxygen fugacity in the mantle (15) is buffered
approximately at QFM, which corresponds to fO2 ~
10 8 at ~ 1200°C. As has been discussed by Kasting
(13), a lower oxgen fugacity in the mantle, near the IW
(iron-wustite) buffer with fO2 ~ 10 12,
would produce CO2/CH4 ~1 for present-day
mantle conditions. Definitive evidence for a more reducing early mantle
is lacking, but it is not unreasonable to expect that core formation
was an imperfect process, and that some fraction of native metal (that is, iron) was left in the mantle. Oxidation of Fe0 to FeO
(wustite) by reaction with H2O, followed by reduction of
CO2 to CH4, requires four moles of
Fe0 for each mole of CH4 produced (net
reaction: 4Fe0 + CO2 + 2H2O = 4FeO + CH4). As an example, a CH4 flux of 100 nmole
cm 2 yr 1 for 100 Myr would require 2 × 1020 moles (40 moles cm 2) Fe0 and
1 × 1020 moles (20 moles cm 2)
H2O, or ~0.0005% of the terrestrial inventory of iron
and ~0.1% of the present ocean reservoir of water. Whether the early
mantle contained such amounts of Fe0 and H2O
after core formation is unknown, but would seem to be plausible. The
total C implied by the above CH4 flux for 100 Myr corresponds to ~100 gC cm 2, or about 1% of the total C
in carbonates today.
Additionally, native metals would act as catalysts for CO2
reduction at lower temperatures, thus allowing CH4 to reach
equilibrium at the ~350°C hydrothermal vent temperatures. Without a
catalyst, CH4 formation is kinetically inhibited at
temperatures below ~500°C at typical hydrothermal vent pressures.
For a QFM buffer and at 500 bars, CO2/CH4 ~ 1 at 400°C; for a PPM (pyrite-pyrhotite-magnetite) buffer,
CO2/CH4 ~ 1 at 275°C.
The model proposed by Sagan and Chyba (1) brings us back to
the earlier models of a reducing primitive Earth atmosphere, with its
many attractive implications for the origin of life.
Stanley L. Miller
James R. Lyons
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0506, USA E-mail:
jrlyons{at}ucsd.edu
REFERENCES
-
C. Sagan and
C. Chyba,
Science
276, p. 1217
(1997)
.
-
J. F. Kasting,
ibid.
259,
920
(1993)
; J. C. G. Walker, Evolution of the Atmosphere (Macmillan, New
York, 1977); H. D. Holland, The Chemical Evolution of the
Atmosphere and Oceans (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ,
1984).
-
A. I. Oparin, The Origin of Life (Macmillen, New
York, 1938).
-
H. C. Urey,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
38,
351
(1952)
[Free Full Text]
.
-
S. L. Miller,
Science
117,
528
(1953)
[Free Full Text]
.
-
C. F. Chyba, P. J. Thomas, L. Brookshaw, C. Sagan,
ibid. 249, 366 (1990).
-
E. L. Shock, Origins Life Evol. Bios. 22, 67 (1992).
-
C. Chyba and
C. Sagan,
Nature
355,
125
(1992)
.
-
C. Sagan and
B. N. Khare,
Science
173,
417
(1971)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
;
B. N. Khare and
C. Sagan,
Nature
232,
577
(1971)
[CrossRef] [Medline]
;
K.-Y. Hong,
J.-H. Hong,
R. S. Becker,
Science
184,
984
(1974)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
-
J. P. Ferris and
C. T. Chen,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
97,
2962
(1975)
[CrossRef] [Web of Science] [Medline]
.
-
K. Zanhle,
J. Geophys. Res.
91,
2819
(1986)
.
-
J. P. Pinto,
G. R. Gladstone,
Y. L. Yung,
Science
210,
183
(1980)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
-
J. F. Kasting,
D. H. Eggler,
S. P. Raeburn,
Geology
101,
245
(1991)
.
-
J. A. Welhan,
Chem. Geol.
71,
183
(1988)
.
-
B. J. Wood,
L. T. Bryndzia,
K. E. Johnson,
Science
248,
337
(1990)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
20 November 1997; accepted 23 January 1998
Response: The late Carl Sagan and I noted in the
introduction to our article (1) that a high-altitude organic
aerosol on early Earth would make the persistence of a reducing
atmosphere more likely, and that such an atmosphere favors organic
synthesis, making the origin of life easier to envision. As we stated,
atmospheres rich in CO2 have been considered more likely
candidates for early terrestrial atmospheres for two reasons. One is
the rapid UV photodissociation of methane and ammonia. Our article
suggests that a reducing "Miller-Urey" atmosphere, when treated
self-consistently, avoids this difficulty because such an atmosphere
would become self-shielding against UV photolysis. The second
long-standing objection to an early reducing atmosphere is
that most models for the oxidation state of the mantle suggest that an
intermediate oxidation state atmosphere was most likely on early Earth.
This argument is unaffected by our article. However, as Miller and
Lyons point out, and as we stated, the issue remains an active area of
research.
Extraterrestrial organics would have been delivered to Earth regardless
of the nature of the early atmosphere. In a full-blown Miller-Urey
atmosphere, exogenous sources are unlikely to have been quantitatively
important, whereas they may have been the dominant source for prebiotic
organics on an early Earth with a CO2-rich atmosphere
(2). I therefore do not agree with the statement by Miller
and Lyons that in light of our article, "there is no role for
exogenous sources of CH4 and other organic compounds." Both exogenous and endogenous sources contributed to the prebiotic organic inventory of early Earth: They were not in competition. Which
sources dominated depended on the nature of the early atmosphere, and
there may have been specific molecules for which one source or the
other was critical. Some recent work (3) hints that exogenous sources may be more important than we earlier estimated (2). Much remains to be understood, including the possible role of exogenous organics in the origin of biological homochirality (4).
It no longer appears correct that aerobraking of small coments or
asteroids in an early dense atmosphere (5) would have allowed these impactors to have collided with sufficiently low velocities for organics to survive. Work on catastrophic explosions of
small asteroids and comets in the atmosphere (6, 7) suggests that, apart from rare iron impactors, objects smaller than ~100 meters in diameter airburst in the terrestrial atmosphere prior to
impact with the ground. This atmospheric "filtering" of impactors would have been even more severe in a putative denser early atmosphere. While studies show that some organics might survive airbursts (2), this work calls earlier estimates (5) of the
role of ~100 m objects into question (7). Estimates of the
importance of the likely dominant exogenous source, delivery by
interplanetary dust particles (2, 8), remain unaffected by
these arguments.
Whatever the sources of prebiotic organics--exogenous and
endogenous--the formation of organic monomers is one of the few parts of the origins-of-life puzzle that is reasonably well in hand. In this
sense, it may no longer be among the most important issues in the field
(9). We can both extract these organics from meteorites and
synthesize them in the laboratory. Nearly all subsequent steps on the
road to the last common ancestor are much less well
understood.
Christopher F. Chyba
Department of Planetary Sciences, University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA E-mail:
chyba{at}lpl.arizona.edu.
REFERENCES
-
C. Sagan and
C. Chyba,
Science
276,
p. 1217 (1997)
.
-
C. Chyba and
C. Sagan,
Nature
355,
125
(1992)
; in Comets and the Origin and Evolution of Life, P. J. Thomas, C. F. Chyba, C. P. McKay, Eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York,
1997), pp. 147-173.
-
L. Becker,
et al.,
Science
265,
642
(1994)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
-
J. R. Cronin and
S. Pizzarello,
ibid.
275,
951
(1997)
; M. Engel and S. Macko, Nature 389 (1997);
C. F. Chyba, ibid., p. 234.
-
C. F. Chyba,
P. J. Thomas,
L. Brookshaw,
C. Sagan,
Science
249,
366
(1990)
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
.
-
C. F. Chyba,
P. J. Thomas,
K. J. Zahnle,
Nature
361,
40
(1993)
; J. G. Hills and M. P. Goda, Astr. J. 105, 1114 (1993);
C. F. Chyba,
Nature
363,
701
(1993)
.
-
P. J. Thomas and L. Brookshaw, in Comets and the Origin
and Evolution of Life, P. J. Thomas, C. F. Chyba, C. P. McKay,
Eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997), pp. 131-145.
-
E. Anders,
Nature
342,
255
(1989)
.
-
C. F. Chyba and
G. D. McDonald,
Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.
24,
215
(1995)
[CrossRef].
29 December 1997; accepted 23 January 1998
|
|