Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 13 April 2007:
Vol. 316. no. 5822, pp. 222 - 234
DOI: 10.1126/science.1139247

Research Articles

Evolutionary and Biomedical Insights from the Rhesus Macaque Genome

Rhesus Macaque Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium*{dagger}, Richard A. Gibbs1,2, Jeffrey Rogers3, Michael G. Katze4, Roger Bumgarner4, George M. Weinstock1,2, Elaine R. Mardis5, Karin A. Remington6, Robert L. Strausberg6, J. Craig Venter6, Richard K. Wilson5, Mark A. Batzer7, Carlos D. Bustamante8, Evan E. Eichler9, Matthew W. Hahn10, Ross C. Hardison11, Kateryna D. Makova11, Webb Miller11, Aleksandar Milosavljevic1,2, Robert E. Palermo4, Adam Siepel8, James M. Sikela12, Tony Attaway1,2, Stephanie Bell1,2, Kelly E. Bernard5, Christian J. Buhay1,2, Mimi N. Chandrabose1,2, Marvin Dao1,2, Clay Davis1,2, Kimberly D. Delehaunty5, Yan Ding1,2, Huyen H. Dinh1,2, Shannon Dugan-Rocha1,2, Lucinda A. Fulton5, Ramatu Ayiesha Gabisi1,2, Toni T. Garner1,2, Jennifer Godfrey5, Alicia C. Hawes1,2, Judith Hernandez1,2, Sandra Hines1,2, Michael Holder1,2, Jennifer Hume1,2, Shalini N. Jhangiani1,2, Vandita Joshi1,2, Ziad Mohid Khan1,2, Ewen F. Kirkness6, Andrew Cree1,2, R. Gerald Fowler1,2, Sandra Lee1,2, Lora R. Lewis1,2, Zhangwan Li1,2, Yih-shin Liu1,2, Stephanie M. Moore1,2, Donna Muzny1,2, Lynne V. Nazareth1,2, Dinh Ngoc Ngo1,2, Geoffrey O. Okwuonu1,2, Grace Pai6, David Parker1,2, Heidie A. Paul1,2, Cynthia Pfannkoch6, Craig S. Pohl5, Yu-Hui Rogers6, San Juana Ruiz1,2, Aniko Sabo1,2, Jireh Santibanez1,2, Brian W. Schneider1,2, Scott M. Smith5, Erica Sodergren1,2, Amanda F. Svatek1,2, Teresa R. Utterback1,2, Selina Vattathil1,2, Wesley Warren5, Courtney Sherell White1,2, Asif T. Chinwalla5, Yucheng Feng5, Aaron L. Halpern6, LaDeana W. Hillier5, Xiaoqiu Huang13, Pat Minx5, Joanne O. Nelson5, Kymberlie H. Pepin5, Xiang Qin1,2, Granger G. Sutton6, Eli Venter6, Brian P. Walenz6, John W. Wallis5, Kim C. Worley1,2, Shiaw-Pyng Yang5, Steven M. Jones14, Marco A. Marra14, Mariano Rocchi15, Jacqueline E. Schein14, Robert Baertsch16, Laura Clarke17, Miklós Csürös18, Jarret Glasscock5, R. Alan Harris1,2, Paul Havlak1,2, Andrew R. Jackson1,2, Huaiyang Jiang1,2, Yue Liu1,2, David N. Messina5, Yufeng Shen1,2, Henry Xing-Zhi Song1,2, Todd Wylie5, Lan Zhang1,2, Ewan Birney17, Kyudong Han7, Miriam K. Konkel7, Jungnam Lee7, Arian F. A. Smit19, Brygg Ullmer20, Hui Wang7, Jinchuan Xing7,21, Richard Burhans11, Ze Cheng9, John E. Karro11, Jian Ma22, Brian Raney22, Xinwei She9, Michael J. Cox12, Jeffery P. Demuth10, Laura J. Dumas12, Sang-Gook Han10, Janet Hopkins12, Anis Karimpour-Fard23, Young H. Kim24, Jonathan R. Pollack24, Tomas Vinar8, Charles Addo-Quaye11, Jeremiah Degenhardt8, Alexandra Denby8, Melissa J. Hubisz25, Amit Indap8, Carolin Kosiol8, Bruce T. Lahn25,26, Heather A. Lawson11, Alison Marklein8, Rasmus Nielsen27, Eric J. Vallender25,26, Andrew G. Clark28, Betsy Ferguson29, Ryan D. Hernandez8, Kashif Hirani1,2, Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki30, Jessica Kolb30, Shobha Patil1,2, Ling-Ling Pu1,2, Yanru Ren1,2, David Glenn Smith3, David A. Wheeler1,2, Ian Schenck11, Edward V. Ball31, Rui Chen1,2, David N. Cooper31, Belinda Giardine11, Fan Hsu22, W. James Kent22, Arthur Lesk11, David L. Nelson2, William E. O'Brien2, Kay Prüfer32, Peter D. Stenson31, James C. Wallace4, Hui Ke33, Xiao-Ming Liu34, Peng Wang33, Andy Peng Xiang33, Fan Yang33, Galt P. Barber22, David Haussler35,16, Donna Karolchik22, Andy D. Kern22, Robert M. Kuhn22, Kayla E. Smith22, Ann S. Zwieg22

1 Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
2 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
3 Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, TX 78227, USA.
4 Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
5 Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
6 J. Craig Venter Institute, 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
7 Department of Biological Sciences, Biological Computation and Visualization Center, Center for BioModular Multi-scale Systems, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
8 Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
9 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
10 Department of Biology and School of Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
11 Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
12 Human Medical Genetics and Neuroscience Programs, Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
13 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
14 Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
15 Department of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
16 Department of Bioinformatics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA.
17 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK.
18 Département d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
19 Institute for Systems Biology, 1441 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103–8904, USA.
20 Center for Computation and Technology, Department of Computer Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
21 Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
22 Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
23 Department of Preventative Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
24 Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
25 Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
26 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
27 Institute of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-1017, Denmark.
28 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
29 Genetics Research and Informatics Program, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
30 Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, 89081, Germany.
31 Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
32 Department Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
33 Centre for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
34 South-China Primate Research and Development Center, Guangzhou 510080, China.
35 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA.


Figure 1 Fig. 1. Evolutionary triangulation in the human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque lineages (lineage-specific breaks), showing a summary of chromosomal breakpoints on a microscopic scale (Fig. 3) (7). Circled numbers indicate numbers of lineage-specific breaks. [View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
 

Figure 2 Fig. 2. Assembly by three methods of the rhesus macaque genome. WGS, whole-genome shotgun. BCM-HGSC, Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center; WashU-GSC, Washington University Genome Sequencing Center; JCVI, J. Craig Venter Institute. QA/QC, quality assurance and quality control. [View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
 

Figure 3 Fig. 3. Chromosomal breakpoints between rhesus macaque and the human-chimpanzee ancestor. Each chromosome is represented by a white bar (left) and a colored bar (right). A total of 820 thin horizontal lines in the white bars represent submicroscopic breakpoints (10-kbp to 4-Mbp range) detected by genomic triangulation (19), and 43 thick black lines in the colored bars represent breakpoints on a microscopic scale (>4 Mbp) (7). Numbers above each bar show the total lines within the bar. [View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
 

Figure 4 Fig. 4. Global pattern of macaque segmental duplications. The statistics are based on all WGAC duplications (> 90%, >1 kb in length), whereas the figure displays only those between 90 and 95% sequence identity and >10 kb in length for simplicity. Red lines indicate interchromosomal (Inter) duplications, blue ticks show intrachromosomal (Intra) events, and purple bars show centromeric, acrocentric, and/or large-gap regions. WGAC, whole-genome assembly comparison. nr, nonredundant. [View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]
 

Figure 5 Fig. 5. Organization of the PRAME gene cluster in the HCR lineages. (A) Maximum-likelihood phylogeny for PRAME-like genes in the human (H), chimpanzee (P), and rhesus macaque (M) genomes. Colored circles indicate inferred duplication events, partial genes are shown in italics, and branches showing significant evidence of positive selection are colored orange (P values are shown above orange lines). Scale bar, 0.05 substitutions per site. (B) Another view of the same phylogeny, showing the duplication history in the context of the species tree (7). [View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
 

Figure 6 Fig. 6. Numbers of human genes passing successive filters in the orthology analysis pipeline. Genes are required to fall in regions of large-scale synteny between genomes, to have completely aligned coding regions, not to have frame-shift indels or altered gene structures, and not to show signs of recent duplication. [View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
 

Figure 7 Fig. 7. Distributions of {omega} in primates versus rodents. Histogram of estimates of {omega} = dN/dS for human, chimpanzee, and macaque versus estimates for mouse and rat in 5641 orthologous quintets, showing a pronounced shift toward larger values in primates (P = 2.2 x 10–16, Mann Whitney test). Genes with dN = 0 or dS = 0 are counted in the relative frequencies but not shown. [View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
 

Figure 8 Fig. 8. SNP within rhesus macaques. (A) SNP densities per kilobase for eight Chinese (blue) and eight Indian (red) individuals in autosomes and the X chromosome. Error bars indicate standard error with variance calculated across individual-chromosome replicates. (B) Distribution of Tajima's D statistic across 166 amplicons for each population (n = 38 for Indian and n = 9 for Chinese individuals). (C) The distribution of the number of haplotypes per haplotype block (determined using the four-gamete test) across five regions. [View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
 

Figure 9 Fig. 9. Ancestral disease mutations. Examples of human mutations that match the sequences of chimp and/or macaque are shown. (A) Genes in which the ancestral allele is now the disease-associated allele in humans. (B) An instance in which the mutant allele in humans is the normal allele in macaque. The amino acid sequences predicted for the boreoeutherian ancestor (65) are given on the top row of each alignment block. Identities are shown as dots and differences are given as letters (73). The position of the mutation in humans is boxed in orange, and the box extends through the relevant comparisons. [View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
 

Figure 10 Fig. 10. Application of rhesus-specific microarrays. A microarray based on the rhesus macaque draft genome was used to analyze gene expression in a macaque model of human influenza infection. Gray bars measure an overall response for indicated functional categories, based on corresponding heat maps, and reveal a significant rebound in expression at day 7 for genes associated with the inflammatory response, when compared to interferon induction. Red, increased expression; green, reduced expression. Details are given in (7, 70). [View Larger Version of this Image (49K GIF file)]
 





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)