Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 17 February 2006:
Vol. 311. no. 5763, pp. 1005 - 1007
DOI: 10.1126/science.1121629

Reports

On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect

Ap Dijksterhuis,* Maarten W. Bos, Loran F. Nordgren, Rick B. van Baaren

Contrary to conventional wisdom, it is not always advantageous to engage in thorough conscious deliberation before choosing. On the basis of recent insights into the characteristics of conscious and unconscious thought, we tested the hypothesis that simple choices (such as between different towels or different sets of oven mitts) indeed produce better results after conscious thought, but that choices in complex matters (such as between different houses or different cars) should be left to unconscious thought. Named the "deliberation-without-attention" hypothesis, it was confirmed in four studies on consumer choice, both in the laboratory as well as among actual shoppers, that purchases of complex products were viewed more favorably when decisions had been made in the absence of attentive deliberation.

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.j.dijksterhuis{at}uva.nl

Read the Full Text



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
When Is Diagnostic Testing Inappropriate or Irrational? Acceptable Regret Approach.
I. Hozo and B. Djulbegovic (2008)
Med Decis Making 28, 540-553
   Abstract »    PDF »
Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research.
S. S. Ho, D. Brossard, and D. A. Scheufele (2008)
Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 20, 171-192
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Multiple Systems in Decision Making.
A. G. SANFEY and L. J. CHANG (2008)
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1128, 53-62
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
After the Flood: Anger, Attribution, and the Seeking of Information.
R. J. Griffin, Zheng Yang, E. ter Huurne, F. Boerner, S. Ortiz, and S. Dunwoody (2008)
Science Communication 29, 285-315
   Abstract »    PDF »
Decision making by patients: who gains?.
D. Bhugra (2008)
International Journal of Social Psychiatry 54, 5-6
   PDF »
Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior.
R. R. Hassin, M. J. Ferguson, D. Shidlovski, and T. Gross (2007)
PNAS 104, 19757-19761
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments.
C. C. Ballew II and A. Todorov (2007)
PNAS 104, 17948-17953
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Are Patient Decision Aids the Best Way to Improve Clinical Decision Making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium.
M. Holmes-Rovner, W. L. Nelson, M. Pignone, G. Elwyn, D. R. Rovner, A. M. O'Connor, A. Coulter, and R. Correa-de-Araujo (2007)
Med Decis Making 27, 599-608
   Abstract »    PDF »
Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity.
W. L. Nelson, P. K. J. Han, A. Fagerlin, M. Stefanek, and P. A. Ubel (2007)
Med Decis Making 27, 609-618
   Abstract »    PDF »
Unconscious Activation of the Cognitive Control System in the Human Prefrontal Cortex.
H. C. Lau and R. E. Passingham (2007)
J. Neurosci. 27, 5805-5811
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
From the Library.
(2006)
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 804
   Full Text »    PDF »
Minerva.
(2006)
BMJ 332, 498
   Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)