Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 6 November 2009:
Vol. 326. no. 5954, pp. 812 - 815
DOI: 10.1126/science.1172245

Review

Einstein’s Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass

Pedro G. Ferreira1,* and Glenn D. Starkman2,*

The observed matter in the universe accounts for just 5% of the observed gravity. A possible explanation is that Newton’s and Einstein’s theories of gravity fail where gravity is either weak or enhanced. The modified theory of Newtonian dynamics (MOND) reproduces, without dark matter, spiral-galaxy orbital motions and the relation between luminosity and rotation in galaxies, although not in clusters. Recent extensions of Einstein’s theory are theoretically more complete. They inevitably include dark fields that seed structure growth, and they may explain recent weak lensing data. However, the presence of dark fields reduces calculability and comes at the expense of the original MOND premise, that the matter we see is the sole source of gravity. Observational tests of the relic radiation, weak lensing, and the growth of structure may distinguish modified gravity from dark matter.

1 Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK.
2 Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics, Institute for the Science of Origins, Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.ferreira1{at}physics.ox.ac.uk (P.G.F.); glenn.starkman{at}case.edu (G.D.S.)

Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)