Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 23 October 2009:
Vol. 326. no. 5952, pp. 535 - 538
DOI: 10.1126/science.1168244

Review

Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences

Armin Falk1 and James J. Heckman2

Laboratory experiments are a widely used methodology for advancing causal knowledge in the physical and life sciences. With the exception of psychology, the adoption of laboratory experiments has been much slower in the social sciences, although during the past two decades the use of lab experiments has accelerated. Nonetheless, there remains considerable resistance among social scientists who argue that lab experiments lack "realism" and generalizability. In this article, we discuss the advantages and limitations of laboratory social science experiments by comparing them to research based on nonexperimental data and to field experiments. We argue that many recent objections against lab experiments are misguided and that even more lab experiments should be conducted.

1 Centre for Economic Policy Research, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), and University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
2 University College Dublin, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, and University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)