Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 4 April 2008:
Vol. 320. no. 5872, pp. 65 - 68
DOI: 10.1126/science.1147888
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Review

Stochasticity and Cell Fate

Richard Losick1 and Claude Desplan2

Fundamental to living cells is the capacity to differentiate into subtypes with specialized attributes. Understanding the way cells acquire their fates is a major challenge in developmental biology. How cells adopt a particular fate is usually thought of as being deterministic, and in the large majority of cases it is. That is, cells acquire their fate by virtue of their lineage or their proximity to an inductive signal from another cell. In some cases, however, and in organisms ranging from bacteria to humans, cells choose one or another pathway of differentiation stochastically, without apparent regard to environment or history. Stochasticity has important mechanistic requirements. We speculate on why stochasticity is advantageous—and even critical in some circumstances—to the individual, the colony, or the species.

1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
2 Center for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise.
S. Huang (2009)
Development 136, 3853-3862
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Capacity for stochastic self-renewal and differentiation in mammalian spermatogonial stem cells.
Z. Wu, K. Luby-Phelps, A. Bugde, L. A. Molyneux, B. Denard, W.-H. Li, G. M. Suel, and D. L. Garbers (2009)
J. Cell Biol. 187, 513-524
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A Noisy Paracrine Signal Determines the Cellular NF-{kappa}B Response to Lipopolysaccharide.
T. K. Lee, E. M. Denny, J. C. Sanghvi, J. E. Gaston, N. D. Maynard, J. J. Hughey, and M. W. Covert (2009)
Science Signaling 2, ra65
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Modeling stochasticity and robustness in gene regulatory networks.
A. Garg, K. Mohanram, A. Di Cara, G. De Micheli, and I. Xenarios (2009)
Bioinformatics 25, i101-i109
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Isolation and Characterization of Superdormant Spores of Bacillus Species.
S. Ghosh and P. Setlow (2009)
J. Bacteriol. 191, 1787-1797
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Maintaining a stochastic neuronal cell fate decision.
D. Vasiliauskas, R. Johnston, and C. Desplan (2009)
Genes & Dev. 23, 385-390
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A pivotal role for the response regulator DegU in controlling multicellular behaviour.
E. J. Murray, T. B. Kiley, and N. R. Stanley-Wall (2009)
Microbiology 155, 1-8
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Bioinformatics Resources for the Study of Gene Regulation in Bacteria.
J. Collado-Vides, H. Salgado, E. Morett, S. Gama-Castro, V. Jimenez-Jacinto, I. Martinez-Flores, A. Medina-Rivera, L. Muniz-Rascado, M. Peralta-Gil, and A. Santos-Zavaleta (2009)
J. Bacteriol. 191, 23-31
   Full Text »    PDF »
Stochasticity and bistability in horizontal transfer control of a genomic island in Pseudomonas.
M. Minoia, M. Gaillard, F. Reinhard, M. Stojanov, V. Sentchilo, and J. R. van der Meer (2008)
PNAS 105, 20792-20797
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The role of Delta-like 1 shedding in muscle cell self-renewal and differentiation.
D. Sun, H. Li, and A. Zolkiewska (2008)
J. Cell Sci. 121, 3815-3823
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A genetic timer through noise-induced stabilization of an unstable state.
M. Turcotte, J. Garcia-Ojalvo, and G. M. Suel (2008)
PNAS 105, 15732-15737
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)