Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Science Careers Booklet

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 7 December 2007:
Vol. 318. no. 5856, p. 1601
DOI: 10.1126/science.1146017

Brevia

Economics of Overexploitation Revisited

R. Q. Grafton,1* T. Kompas,1 R. W. Hilborn2

About 25% of the world's fisheries are depleted such that their current biomass is lower than the level that would maximize the sustained yield (MSY). By using methods not previously applied in the fisheries conservation context, we show in four disparate fisheries (including the long-lived and slow-growing orange roughy) that the dynamic maximum economic yield (MEY), the biomass that produces the largest discounted economic profits from fishing, exceeds MSY. Thus, although it is theoretically possible that maximizing discounted economic profits may cause stock depletions, our results show there is a win-win: In many fisheries at reasonable discount rates and at current prices and costs, larger fish stocks increase economic profits. An MEY target that exceeds MSY and transfers from higher, future profits to compensate fishers for the transition costs of stock rebuilding would help overcome a key cause of fisheries overexploitation, industry opposition to lower harvests.

1 Crawford School, Australian National University, Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
2 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Box 355020, University of Washington, 112 Boat Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: quentin.grafton{at}anu.edu.au

Read the Full Text





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products