Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 2 November 2007:
Vol. 318. no. 5851, pp. 792 - 794
DOI: 10.1126/science.1147555

Reports

Molecular and Genomic Data Identify the Closest Living Relative of Primates

Jan E. Janecka,1 Webb Miller,2 Thomas H. Pringle,3 Frank Wiens,4 Annette Zitzmann,5 Kristofer M. Helgen,6 Mark S. Springer,7 William J. Murphy1*

A full understanding of primate morphological and genomic evolution requires the identification of their closest living relative. In order to resolve the ancestral relationships among primates and their closest relatives, we searched multispecies genome alignments for phylogenetically informative rare genomic changes within the superordinal group Euarchonta, which includes the orders Primates, Dermoptera (colugos), and Scandentia (treeshrews). We also constructed phylogenetic trees from 14 kilobases of nuclear genes for representatives from most major primate lineages, both extant colugos, and multiple treeshrews, including the pentail treeshrew, Ptilocercus lowii, the only living member of the family Ptilocercidae. A relaxed molecular clock analysis including Ptilocercus suggests that treeshrews arose approximately 63 million years ago. Our data show that colugos are the closest living relatives of primates and indicate that their divergence occurred in the Cretaceous.

1 Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
2 Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
3 Sperling Foundation, Eugene, OR 97405, USA.
4 Department of Animal Physiology, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
5 Zoological Institute, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, D-60054 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
6 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA.
7 Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Administration Building, Room 107, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843–4458, USA. E-mail: wmurphy{at}cvm.tamu.edu

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Networks, Trees, and Treeshrews: Assessing Support and Identifying Conflict with Multiple Loci and a Problematic Root.
T. E. Roberts, E. J. Sargis, and L. E. Olson (2009)
Syst Biol
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Support Patterns from Different Outgroups Provide a Strong Phylogenetic Signal.
A. Schneider and G. M. Cannarozzi (2009)
Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1259-1272
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A new tarkadectine primate from the Eocene of Inner Mongolia, China: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications.
X. Ni, J. Meng, K. C. Beard, D. L. Gebo, Y. Wang, and C. Li (2009)
Proc R Soc B
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Retroposon analysis and recent geological data suggest near-simultaneous divergence of the three superorders of mammals.
H. Nishihara, S. Maruyama, and N. Okada (2009)
PNAS 106, 5235-5240
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Chronic intake of fermented floral nectar by wild treeshrews.
F. Wiens, A. Zitzmann, M.-A. Lachance, M. Yegles, F. Pragst, F. M. Wurst, D. von Holst, S. L. Guan, and R. Spanagel (2008)
PNAS 105, 10426-10431
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)