Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 7 September 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5843, pp. 1347 - 1351
DOI: 10.1126/science.1140734

Review

Social Components of Fitness in Primate Groups

Joan B. Silk

There is much interest in the evolutionary forces that favored the evolution of large brains in the primate order. The social brain hypothesis posits that selection has favored larger brains and more complex cognitive capacities as a means to cope with the challenges of social life. The hypothesis is supported by evidence that shows that group size is linked to various measures of brain size. But it has not been clear how cognitive complexity confers fitness advantages on individuals. Research in the field and laboratory shows that sophisticated social cognition underlies social behavior in primate groups. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that the quality of social relationships has measurable fitness consequences for individuals.

Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. E-mail: jsilk{at}anthro.ucla.edu

Read the Full Text



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A common SNP of MCPH1 is associated with cranial volume variation in Chinese population.
J.-k. Wang, Y. Li, and B. Su (2008)
Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 1329-1335
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Evolution in the Social Brain.
R. I. M. Dunbar and S. Shultz (2007)
Science 317, 1344-1347
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)