Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
ISSCR

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 August 2006:
Vol. 313. no. 5787, pp. 684 - 687
DOI: 10.1126/science.1128356

Reports

Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain

Benedetto De Martino,* Dharshan Kumaran, Ben Seymour, Raymond J. Dolan

Human choices are remarkably susceptible to the manner in which options are presented. This so-called "framing effect" represents a striking violation of standard economic accounts of human rationality, although its underlying neurobiology is not understood. We found that the framing effect was specifically associated with amygdala activity, suggesting a key role for an emotional system in mediating decision biases. Moreover, across individuals, orbital and medial prefrontal cortex activity predicted a reduced susceptibility to the framing effect. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating emotional processes within models of human choice and suggests how the brain may modulate the effect of these biasing influences to approximate rationality.

Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1 3AR, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: b.martino{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Read the Full Text



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor.
J. M. Coates and J. Herbert (2008)
PNAS 105, 6167-6172
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Multiple Systems in Decision Making.
A. G. SANFEY and L. J. CHANG (2008)
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1128, 53-62
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Functional Imaging of Decision Conflict.
J.-B. Pochon, J. Riis, A. G. Sanfey, L. E. Nystrom, and J. D. Cohen (2008)
J. Neurosci. 28, 3468-3473
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Will: From Metaphysical Freedom to Normative Functionalism.
A. R. Felthous (2008)
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36, 16-24
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception.
A Charuvastra and S R Marder (2008)
J. Med. Ethics 34, 193-197
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Human Pavlovian Instrumental Transfer.
D. Talmi, B. Seymour, P. Dayan, and R. J. Dolan (2008)
J. Neurosci. 28, 360-368
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Immediate Reward Bias in Humans: Fronto-Parietal Networks and a Role for the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase 158Val/Val Genotype.
C. A. Boettiger, J. M. Mitchell, V. C. Tavares, M. Robertson, G. Joslyn, M. D'Esposito, and H. L. Fields (2007)
J. Neurosci. 27, 14383-14391
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Vulnerability of the Orbitofrontal Cortex to Age-Associated Structural and Functional Brain Changes.
S. M. RESNICK, M. LAMAR, and I. DRISCOLL (2007)
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1121, 562-575
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Hormonal and Genetic Influences on Processing Reward and Social Information.
X. CALDU and J.-C. DREHER (2007)
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1118, 43-73
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Decision-Making Dysfunctions in Psychiatry Altered Homeostatic Processing?.
M. P. Paulus (2007)
Science 318, 602-606
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk.
S. M. Tom, C. R. Fox, C. Trepel, and R. A. Poldrack (2007)
Science 315, 515-518
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products