Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 7 July 2006:
Vol. 313. no. 5783, p. 45
DOI: 10.1126/science.1127705

Technical Comments

Comment on "On the Regulation of Populations of Mammals, Birds, Fish, and Insects" IV

Elizabeth Peacock1* and David L. Garshelis2

Sibly et al.'s (Reports, 22 July 2005, p. 607) contention that density dependence acts strongly on low-density animal populations irrespective of body size contradicts many long-term studies of large mammals. Their findings were distorted by harvest records, which may poorly reflect population trend. Omitting unreliable data, their massive data set is reduced to only one case for large mammals.

1 Department of Biology, University of Nevada–Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
2 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: epeacock{at}gov.nu.ca

Read the Full Text






To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)