Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 24 February 2006:
Vol. 311. no. 5764, p. 1100
DOI: 10.1126/science.1121388
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Technical Comments

Comment on "On the Regulation of Populations of Mammals, Birds, Fish, and Insects" I

Wayne M. Getz* and James O. Lloyd-Smith

Sibly et al. (Reports, 22 July 2005, p. 607) concluded that density dependence acts far below the carrying capacity in most animal populations. We argue that the authors confused discrete and continuous models, that their best-fit models cannot explain observed oscillations, and that their estimation procedures appear biased. They also neglected trophic and migratory processes, which we demonstrate could underlie their empirical findings.

Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720–3114, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: getz{at}nature.berkeley.edu

Read the Full Text

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)