Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
On the Regulation of Populations of Mammals, Birds, Fish, and Insects
Richard M. Sibly,1*Daniel Barker,1Michael C. Denham,2Jim Hone,3Mark Pagel1
A key unresolved question in population ecology concerns therelationship between a population's size and its growth rate.We estimated this relationship for 1780 time series of mammals,birds, fish, and insects. We found that rates of populationgrowth are high at low population densities but, contrary toprevious predictions, decline rapidly with increasing populationsize and then flatten out, for all four taxa. This producesa strongly concave relationship between a population's growthrate and its size. These findings have fundamental implicationsfor our understanding of animals' lives, suggesting in particularthat many animals in these taxa will be found living at densitiesabove the carrying capacity of their environments.
1 School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, UK. 2 Statistical Sciences Europe, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development Limited, New Frontiers Science Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK. 3 Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.m.sibly{at}reading.ac.uk
Richard M. Sibly, Daniel Barker, Michael C. Denham, Jim Hone, and Mark Pagel (7 July 2006) Science313 (5783), 45b.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1124493] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Wayne M. Getz and James O. Lloyd-Smith (24 February 2006) Science311 (5764), 1100a.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1121388] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Joshua V. Ross (24 February 2006) Science311 (5764), 1100b.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1121875] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
C. Patrick Doncaster (24 February 2006) Science311 (5764), 1100c.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1122383] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Richard M. Sibly, Daniel Barker, Michael C. Denham, Jim Hone, and Mark Pagel (24 February 2006) Science311 (5764), 1100d.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1121565] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
PERSPECTIVES
John D. Reynolds and Robert P. Freckleton (22 July 2005) Science309 (5734), 567.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1116268] |Summary »|Full Text »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Scaling rules for the final decline to extinction.