Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Click Me!

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 27 July 2001:
Vol. 293. no. 5530, pp. 657 - 660
DOI: 10.1126/science.293.5530.657

Viewpoint

Ecological Forecasts: An Emerging Imperative

James S. Clark,1* Steven R. Carpenter,2 Mary Barber,3 Scott Collins,4 Andy Dobson,5 Jonathan A. Foley,6 David M. Lodge,7 Mercedes Pascual,8 Roger Pielke Jr.,9 William Pizer,10 Cathy Pringle,11 Walter V. Reid,12 Kenneth A. Rose,13 Osvaldo Sala,14 William H. Schlesinger,15 Diana H. Wall,16 David Wear17

Planning and decision-making can be improved by access to reliable forecasts of ecosystem state, ecosystem services, and natural capital. Availability of new data sets, together with progress in computation and statistics, will increase our ability to forecast ecosystem change. An agenda that would lead toward a capacity to produce, evaluate, and communicate forecasts of critical ecosystem services requires a process that engages scientists and decision-makers. Interdisciplinary linkages are necessary because of the climate and societal controls on ecosystems, the feedbacks involving social change, and the decision-making relevance of forecasts.

1 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
2 University of Wisconsin Center for Limnology, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
3 Ecological Society of America, 1707 H Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
4 Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
5 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
6 Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
7 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
8 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
9 Environmental and Societal Impacts Group/National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3250 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.
10 Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
11 Department of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
12 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 731 North 79th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
13 Coastal Fisheries Institute and Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
14 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy-IFEVA, University of Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires 1417, Argentina.
15 Nicholas School of Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
16 Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
17 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Post Office Box 12254, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jimclark{at}duke.edu


Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD.
J. W. Williams, S. T. Jackson, and J. E. Kutzbach (2007)
PNAS 104, 5738-5742
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Profile of Stephen R. Carpenter.
N. Zagorski (2005)
PNAS 102, 9999-10001
   Full Text »    PDF »
The success of animal invaders.
M. J. Vander Zanden (2005)
PNAS 102, 7055-7056
   Full Text »    PDF »
A framework for ecosystem impacts assessment using an indicator approach.
P.A. Livingston, K. Aydin, J. Boldt, J. Ianelli, and J. Jurado-Molina (2005)
ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 592-597
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Challenges of Modeling Ocean Basin Ecosystems.
B. deYoung, M. Heath, F. Werner, F. Chai, B. Megrey, and P. Monfray (2004)
Science 304, 1463-1466
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
PREDICTING TRIATOMA DIMIDIATA ABUNDANCE AND INFECTION RATE: A RISK MAP FOR NATURAL TRANSMISSION OF CHAGAS DISEASE IN THE YUCATAN PENINSULA OF MEXICO.
E. DUMONTEIL and S. GOURBIERE (2004)
Am J Trop Med Hyg 70, 514-519
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Bioavailability of organic matter in a highly disturbed estuary: The role of detrital and algal resources.
W. V. Sobczak, J. E. Cloern, A. D. Jassby, and A. B. Muller-Solger (2002)
PNAS 99, 8101-8105
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products