Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
This article has been retracted

Science 16 July 1999:
Vol. 285. no. 5426, pp. 384 - 387
DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5426.384
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Review

Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.

George Gaskell, 1* Martin W. Bauer, 2 John Durant, 3 Nicholas C. Allum 1

Recent controversies about genetically modified foods in the United Kingdom and several other European countries highlight the apparent differences that exist in public opinion on this subject across the Atlantic. Why are people in the United States seemingly untroubled by a technology that causes Europeans so many difficulties? The results of survey research on public perceptions of biotechnology in Europe and the United States during 1996-1997, together with an analysis of press coverage and policy formation from 1984 to 1996, can help to answer this question.

1 Methodology Institute,
2 Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
3 The Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2DD, UK.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: G.Gaskell{at}lse.ac.uk

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
"We Begin Tonight With Fruits and Vegetables": Genetically Modified Food on the Evening News 1980-2003.
M. L. Nucci and R. Kubey (2007)
Science Communication 29, 147-176
   Abstract »    PDF »
Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide.
M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel (2007)
Public Understanding of Science 16, 421-440
   Abstract »    PDF »
Culture and Technological Innovation: Impact of Institutional Trust and Appreciation of Nature on Attitudes towards Food Biotechnology in the USA and Germany.
H. P. Peters, J. T. Lang, M. Sawicka, and W. K. Hallman (2007)
Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 19, 191-220
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Localized Debates of Agricultural Biotechnology in Community Newspapers: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Media Frames and Sources.
C. E. Crawley (2007)
Science Communication 28, 314-346
   Abstract »    PDF »
Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology.
D. Brossard and M. C. Nisbet (2007)
Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 19, 24-52
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology.
M. D. Cobb (2005)
Science Communication 27, 221-239
   Abstract »    PDF »
Transgenic Crops and Sustainable Agriculture in the European Context.
L. Ponti (2005)
Bulletin of Science Technology Society 25, 289-305
   Abstract »    PDF »
Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology.
J. C. Besley and J. Shanahan (2005)
Science Communication 26, 347-367
   Abstract »    PDF »
Attitudes towards genetics: a case study among Brazilian high school students.
L. Massarani and I. d. C. Moreira (2005)
Public Understanding of Science 14, 201-212
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues.
R. Pardo and F. Calvo (2004)
Public Understanding of Science 13, 203-227
   Abstract »    PDF »
Internalizing the Societal Costs of Agricultural Production.
F. H. Buttel (2003)
Plant Physiology 133, 1656-1665
   Full Text »    PDF »
Biotechnology and the American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999.
M. C. Nisbet and B. V. Lewenstein (2002)
Science Communication 23, 359-391
   Abstract »    PDF »
Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis.
R. Pardo and F. Calvo (2002)
Public Understanding of Science 11, 155-195
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Importance of Being Accountable: The Relationship between Perceptions of Accountability, Knowledge, and Attitude toward Plant Genetic Engineering.
T. Irani, J. Sinclair, and M. O'malley (2002)
Science Communication 23, 225-242
   Abstract »    PDF »
Representations of health risks: What social psychology can offer health promotion.
H. Joffe (2002)
Health Education Journal 61, 153-165
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)