Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 June 1999:
Vol. 284. no. 5420, pp. 1640 - 1644
DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5420.1640
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Research Articles

Selfish Sentinels in Cooperative Mammals

T. H. Clutton-Brock, 1* M. J. O'Riain, 2 P. N. M. Brotherton, 1 D. Gaynor, 2 R. Kansky, 2 A. S. Griffin, 3 M. Manser 1

Like humans engaged in risky activities, group members of some animal societies take turns acting as sentinels. Explanations of the evolution of sentinel behavior have frequently relied on kin selection or reciprocal altruism, but recent models suggest that guarding may be an individual's optimal activity once its stomach is full if no other animal is on guard. This paper provides support for this last explanation by showing that, in groups of meerkats (Suricata suricatta), animals guard from safe sites, and solitary individuals as well as group members spend part of their time on guard. Though individuals seldom take successive guarding bouts, there is no regular rota, and the provision of food increases contributions to guarding and reduces the latency between bouts by the same individual.

1 Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
2 Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
3 Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thcb{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.
M. B. V. Bell, A. N. Radford, R. Rose, H. M. Wade, and A. R. Ridley (2009)
Proc R Soc B 276, 2997-3005
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Vigilance and predation of a forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure.
M. Griesser and M. Nystrand (2009)
Behav. Ecol. 20, 709-715
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Vigilance and its complex synchrony in the red-necked pademelon, Thylogale thetis.
O. Pays, A.-L. Dubot, P. J. Jarman, P. Loisel, and A. W. Goldizen (2009)
Behav. Ecol. 20, 22-29
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Variation in contributions to teaching by meerkats.
A. Thornton (2008)
Proc R Soc B 275, 1745-1751
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members.
O. Pays, P.-C. Renaud, P. Loisel, M. Petit, J.-F. Gerard, and P. J Jarman (2007)
Proc R Soc B 274, 1287-1291
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Group decision making in fission-fusion societies: evidence from two-field experiments in Bechstein's bats.
G. Kerth, C. Ebert, and C. Schmidtke (2006)
Proc R Soc B 273, 2785-2790
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.
C. Hauert, M. Holmes, and M. Doebeli (2006)
Proc R Soc B 273, 2565-2571
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Asynchronous snowdrift game with synergistic effect as a model of cooperation.
A. Kun, G. Boza, and I. Scheuring (2006)
Behav. Ecol. 17, 633-641
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Endogenous timing in competitive interactions among relatives.
M. A Cant and S.-F. Shen (2006)
Proc R Soc B 273, 171-178
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Group stability and homing behavior but no kin group structures in a coral reef fish.
N. Kolm, E.A. Hoffman, J. Olsson, A. Berglund, and A.G. Jones (2005)
Behav. Ecol. 16, 521-527
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors.
M. Doebeli, C. Hauert, and T. Killingback (2004)
Science 306, 859-862
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Helping opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids.
N. Y. Werner, S. Balshine, B. Leach, and A. Lotem (2003)
Behav. Ecol. 14, 749-756
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state.
A. F. Russell, P. N. M. Brotherton, G. M. McIlrath, L. L. Sharpe, and T. H. Clutton-Brock (2003)
Behav. Ecol. 14, 486-492
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay?.
H. Kokko, R. A. Johnstone, and J. Wright (2002)
Behav. Ecol. 13, 291-300
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Breeding Together: Kin Selection and Mutualism in Cooperative Vertebrates.
T. Clutton-Brock (2002)
Science 296, 69-72
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Colony defense in Damaraland mole-rats, Cryptomys damarensis.
R. Cooney (2002)
Behav. Ecol. 13, 160-162
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Offspring food allocation by parents and helpers in a cooperative mammal.
P. N. M. Brotherton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, M. J. O'Riain, D. Gaynor, L. Sharpe, R. Kansky, and G. M. McIlrath (2001)
Behav. Ecol. 12, 590-599
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)