Interpreting Dutch Cannabis Policy: Reasoning by Analogy in the Legalization Debate
Robert MacCoun,
Peter Reuter
The Dutch depenalization and subsequent de facto legalization of
cannabis since 1976 is used here to highlight the strengths and
limitations of reasoning by analogy as a guide for projecting the
effects of relaxing drug prohibitions. While the Dutch case and other
analogies have flaws, they appear to converge in suggesting that
reductions in criminal penalties have limited effects on drug use--at
least for marijuana--but that commercial access is associated with
growth in the drug-using population.
R. MacCoun is at the Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of
Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7320, USA.
E-mail: maccoun{at}socrates.berkeley.edu
P. Reuter is at the School of Public Affairs and Department of
Criminology, University of Maryland, MD 20742, USA.