Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 14 March 1997:
Vol. 275. no. 5306, pp. 1604 - 1610
DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1604

Articles

Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar

Alan Prince * and Paul Smolensky *

Can concepts from the theory of neural computation contribute to formal theories of the mind? Recent research has explored the implications of one principle of neural computation, optimization, for the theory of grammar. Optimization over symbolic linguistic structures provides the core of a new grammatical architecture, optimality theory. The proposition that grammaticality equals optimality sheds light on a wide range of phenomena, from the gulf between production and comprehension in child language, to language learnability, to the fundamental questions of linguistic theory: What is it that the grammars of all languages share, and how may they differ?

A. Prince is in the Department of Linguistics and Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, 18 Seminary Place, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. E-mail: prince{at}ruccs.rutgers.edu  P. Smolensky is in the Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-2685, USA. E-mail: smolensky{at}cogsci.jhu.edu
*   Both authors contributed equally to this work.


Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)