Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 3 April 1992:
Vol. 256. no. 5053, pp. 94 - 97
DOI: 10.1126/science.1348871

Articles

Science, Vol 256, Issue 5053, 94-97
Copyright © 1992 by American Association for the Advancement of Science


articles

Competition for overlapping sites in the regulatory region of the Drosophila gene Kruppel

M Hoch, N Gerwin, H Taubert, and H Jackle

Max-Planck-Institut fur Biophysikalische Chemie, Abteilung Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Gottingen, Federal Republic of Germany.

A 730-base pair element regulates expression of the Drosophila gap gene Kruppel (Kr) in response to the fly anterior morphogen bicoid (bcd). Two hormone receptor-like proteins, encoded by the genes knirps (kni) and tailless (tll), bind specifically to the element. In vitro, kni protein competes with the homeodomain-containing bcd protein in binding to a 16-base pair target sequence. In vivo experiments suggest that both kni and tll act as competitive repressors of bcd-mediated activation of Kr. These results suggest a mechanism by which developmental genes can be regulated in response to an activating morphogen gradient antagonized by repressors.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
The C. elegans tailless/Tlx homolog nhr-67 regulates a stage-specific program of linker cell migration in male gonadogenesis.
M. Kato and P. W. Sternberg (2009)
Development 136, 3907-3915
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Effect of lead exposure on serum immunoglobulins and reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediate.
K P Mishra, U K Chauhan, and S. Naik (2006)
Human and Experimental Toxicology 25, 661-665
   Abstract »    PDF »
Nuclear receptor TLX prevents retinal dystrophy and recruits the corepressor atrophin1..
C.-L. Zhang, Y. Zou, R. T. Yu, F. H. Gage, and R. M. Evans (2006)
Genes & Dev. 20, 1308-1320
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The tailless nuclear receptor acts as a dedicated repressor in the early Drosophila embryo..
E. Moran and G. Jimenez (2006)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 3446-3454
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cross talking of network motifs in gene regulation that generates temporal pulses and spatial stripes.
S. Ishihara, K. Fujimoto, and T. Shibata (2005)
Genes Cells 10, 1025-1038
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
EVOPRINTER, a multigenomic comparative tool for rapid identification of functionally important DNA.
W. F. Odenwald, W. Rasband, A. Kuzin, and T. Brody (2005)
PNAS 102, 14700-14705
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Dynamical Analysis of Regulatory Interactions in the Gap Gene System of Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Jaeger, M. Blagov, D. Kosman, K. N. Kozlov, Manu, E. Myasnikova, S. Surkova, C. E. Vanario-Alonso, M. Samsonova, D. H. Sharp, et al. (2004)
Genetics 167, 1721-1737
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
CtBP Contributes Quantitatively to Knirps Repression Activity in an NAD Binding-Dependent Manner.
M. Sutrias-Grau and D. N. Arnosti (2004)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5953-5966
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Expected Rates and Modes of Evolution of Enhancer Sequences.
S. MacArthur and J. F. Y. Brookfield (2004)
Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1064-1073
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps.
P. Struffi, M. Corado, M. Kulkarni, and D. N. Arnosti (2004)
Development 131, 2419-2429
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Transcriptional regulation of the Drosophila gene zen by competing Smad and Brinker inputs.
C. Rushlow, P. F. Colosimo, M.-c. Lin, M. Xu, and N. Kirov (2001)
Genes & Dev. 15, 340-351
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Transcriptional regulation of Alzheimer's disease genes: implications for susceptibility.
J. Theuns and C. Van Broeckhoven (2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2383-2394
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Purification and Identification of a Tissue-specific Repressor Involved in Serum Amyloid A1 Gene Expression.
Y. Ren, S. A. G. Reddy, and W. S.-L. Liao (1999)
J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37154-37160
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Identification of a photoreceptor cell-specific nuclear receptor.
M. Kobayashi, S.-i. Takezawa, K. Hara, R. T. Yu, Y. Umesono, K. Agata, M. Taniwaki, K. Yasuda, and K. Umesono (1999)
PNAS 96, 4814-4819
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The control of cell fate in the embryonic visual system by atonal, tailless and EGFR signaling.
A Daniel, K Dumstrei, J. Lengyel, and V Hartenstein (1999)
Development 126, 2945-2954
   Abstract »    PDF »
Interaction of Short-Range Repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the Embryo.
Y. Nibu, H. Zhang, and M. Levine (1998)
Science 280, 101-104
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Nab1, a Corepressor of NGFI-A (Egr-1), Contains an Active Transcriptional Repression Domain.
A. H. Swirnoff, E. D. Apel, J. Svaren, B. R. Sevetson, D. B. Zimonjic, N. C. Popescu, and J. Milbrandt (1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 512-524
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Torso signalling regulates terminal patterning in Drosophila by antagonising Groucho-mediated repression.
Z Paroush, S. Wainwright, and D Ish-Horowicz (1997)
Development 124, 3827-3834
   Abstract »    PDF »
Characterization of a notochord-specific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis.
J. Corbo, M Levine, and R. Zeller (1997)
Development 124, 589-602
   Abstract »    PDF »
Developmental expression of synthetic cis-regulatory systems composed of spatial control elements from two different genes.
C. V. Kirchhamer, L. D. Bogarad, and E. H. Davidson (1996)
PNAS 93, 13849-13854
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila..
S Gray and M Levine (1996)
Genes & Dev. 10, 700-710
   Abstract »    PDF »
Drosophila brachyenteron regulates gene activity and morphogenesis in the gut.
J. Singer, R Harbecke, T Kusch, R Reuter, and J. Lengyel (1996)
Development 122, 3707-3718
   Abstract »    PDF »
The torso response element binds GAGA and NTF-1/Elf-1, and regulates tailless by relief of repression..
G J Liaw, K M Rudolph, J D Huang, T Dubnicoff, A J Courey, and J A Lengyel (1995)
Genes & Dev. 9, 3163-3176
   Abstract »    PDF »
Posterior stripe expression of hunchback is driven from two promoters by a common enhancer element.
J. Margolis, M. Borowsky, E Steingrimsson, C. Shim, J. Lengyel, and J. Posakony (1995)
Development 121, 3067-3077
   Abstract »    PDF »
Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter..
S Gray, P Szymanski, and M Levine (1994)
Genes & Dev. 8, 1829-1838
   Abstract »    PDF »
Later embryogenesis: regulatory circuitry in morphogenetic fields.
E. Davidson (1993)
Development 118, 665-690
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Pit-1beta Domain Dictates Active Repression and Alteration of Histone Acetylation of the Proximal Prolactin Promoter.
S. E. Diamond and A. Gutierrez-Hartmann (2000)
J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30977-30986
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Conserved and divergent aspects of terminal patterning in the beetle Tribolium castaneum.
R. Schroder, C. Eckert, C. Wolff, and D. Tautz (2000)
PNAS 97, 6591-6596
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Extraction of Functional Binding Sites from Unique Regulatory Regions: The Drosophila Early Developmental Enhancers.
D. A. Papatsenko, V. J. Makeev, A. P. Lifanov, M. Regnier, A. G. Nazina, and C. Desplan (2002)
Genome Res. 12, 470-481
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)