Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 30 June 1989:
Vol. 244. no. 4912, pp. 1589 - 1593
DOI: 10.1126/science.2740904
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Science, Vol 244, Issue 4912, 1589-1593
Copyright © 1989 by American Association for the Advancement of Science

articles

Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals

MD Pagel and PH Harvey

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Theories for the evolution of brain weight in mammals suggest that closely related species have diverged largely as a result of selection for differences in body weight, but that differences among more distantly related species have arisen due to greater net directional selection on brain weight. This pattern of changing selection causes brain weight to evolve more slowly than body weight among closely related species, such as those in the same genus, than among more distantly related species, such as those from different families or orders; a phenomenon known as the "taxon-level effect." Thus, brain weight differs more for a given difference in body weight as the species compared are more distantly related. An alternative explanation for the taxon-level effect is proposed. Distantly related species are more likely to inhabit different ecological conditions than are more closely related species. Where the taxon-level effect occurs, brain weight appears to have evolved in response to the demands of these different ecological conditions. As a consequence, brain weight differs more among distantly related species, for any given difference in body weight, than among closely related species. This effect, rather than a progressive pattern of changing selection pressures, may account for the taxon-level effect in mammals.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Within-Species Variation and Measurement Error in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods.
A. R. Ives, P. E. Midford, and T. Garland Jr. (2007)
Syst Biol 56, 252-270
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
An alternative method for predicting body mass: the case of the Pleistocene marsupial lion.
(2003)
Paleobiology 29, 403-411
Comparing brains.
P. Harvey and J. Krebs (1990)
Science 249, 140-146
   Abstract »    PDF »
Allometric Engineering: An Experimental Test of the Causes of Interpopulational Differences in Performance.
B. Sinervo and R. B. Huey (1990)
Science 248, 1106-1109
   Abstract »    PDF »
Endocranial features of Australopithecus africanus revealed by 2- and 3-D computed tomography.
G. Conroy, M. Vannier, and P. Tobias (1990)
Science 247, 838-841
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)