Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 1 April 1988:
Vol. 240. no. 4848, pp. 66 - 67
DOI: 10.1126/science.3353708

Articles

Science, Vol 240, Issue 4848, 66-67
Copyright © 1988 by American Association for the Advancement of Science


articles

The nasotemporal division in primate retina: the neural bases of macular sparing and splitting

AG Leventhal, SJ Ault, and DJ Vitek

Department of Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.

In primates, each hemisphere contains a representation of the contralateral visual hemifield; unilateral damage to the visual pathways results in loss of vision in half of the visual field. Apparently similar severe, unilateral lesions to the central visual pathways can result in two qualitatively different central visual field defects termed macular sparing and macular splitting. In macular sparing a 2 degrees to 3 degrees region around the fovea is spared from the effects of unilateral damage to the visual pathways. In macular splitting there is no such spared region and the scotoma produced by unilateral brain damage bisects the fovea. The patterns of decussation of the different classes of retinal ganglion cells in both New World (Saimiri sciureus) and Old World (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys have been determined by horseradish peroxidase injection. In both species the distributions of ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting ganglion cells in the central retina are different from those in other mammals and suggest neural bases for macular sparing and splitting, respectively.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: Hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
T. R. Jordan, K. B. Paterson, and S. Kurtev (2009)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 9, 113-121
   Abstract »    PDF »
Nasotemporal Overlap of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Humans: A Functional Study.
J. Reinhard and S. Trauzettel-Klosinski (2003)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 1568-1572
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Architecture of the Optic Chiasm and the Mechanisms That Sculpt Its Development.
G. Jeffery (2001)
Physiol Rev 81, 1393-1414
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition?.
M. S. Gazzaniga (2000)
Brain 123, 1293-1326
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Central Visual Field in Homonymous Hemianopia: Evidence for Unilateral Foveal Representation.
L. G. Gray, S. L. Galetta, T. Siegal, and N. J. Schatz (1997)
Arch Neurol 54, 312-317
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Representation of the Visual Field in Human Striate Cortex: A Revision of the Classic Holmes Map.
J. C. Horton and W. F. Hoyt (1991)
Arch Ophthalmol 109, 816-824
   Abstract »    PDF »
Organization of the human brain.
M. Gazzaniga (1989)
Science 245, 947-952
   Abstract »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)