Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
GoGreen Membership

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 3 July 1987:
Vol. 237. no. 4810, pp. 31 - 35
DOI: 10.1126/science.237.4810.31

Articles

R&D and Productivity: Measurement Issues and Econometric Results

ZVI GRILICHES 1

1 Professor of economics at Harvard University and program director, Productivity and Technical Change Studies, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138.

The direct successes of space, defense, and health research are not reflected in the national productivity accounts. Nor are many of the improvements in technologically complex new products. Econometric studies underestimate, therefore, the full contribution of R&D, especially since it is difficult to trace its spillover effects. Nevertheless, a recent study finds a significant contribution of R&D to productivity growth in the largest U.S. manufacturing corporations, with no evidence of a major decline in it, and a larger role for basic research and a smaller one for federally financed R&D expenditures than is implied by their relative importance in total R&D expenditures.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Underinvestment: The Energy Technology and R&D Policy Challenge.
R. M. Margolis and D. M. Kammen (1999)
Science 285, 690-692
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Measuring science: An exploration.
J. Adams and Z. Griliches (1996)
PNAS 93, 12664-12670
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)