Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 1 May 1987:
Vol. 236. no. 4801, pp. 593 - 595
DOI: 10.1126/science.2437652
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Science, Vol 236, Issue 4801, 593-595
Copyright © 1987 by American Association for the Advancement of Science

articles

A chicken transferrin gene in transgenic mice escapes X-chromosome inactivation

MA Goldman, KR Stokes, RL Idzerda, GS McKnight, RE Hammer, RL Brinster, and SM Gartler

Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation involves a coordinate shutting down of physically linked genes. Several proposed models require the presence of specific sequences near genes to permit the spread of inactivation into these regions. If such models are correct, one might predict that heterologous genes transferred onto the X chromosome might lack the appropriate signal sequences and therefore escape inactivation. To determine whether a foreign gene inserted into the X chromosome is subject to inactivation, transgenic mice harboring 11 copies of the complete, 17-kilobase chicken transferrin gene on the X chromosome were used. Male mice hemizygous for this insert were bred with females bearing Searle's translocation, an X-chromosome rearrangement that is always active in heterozygous females (the unrearranged X chromosome is inactive). Female offspring bearing the Searle's translocation and the chicken transferrin gene had the same amount of chicken transferrin messenger RNA in liver as did transgenic male mice or transgenic female mice lacking the Searle's chromosome. This result shows that the inserted gene is not subject to X-chromosome inactivation and suggests that the inactivation process cannot spread over 187 kilobases of DNA in the absence of specific signal sequences required for inactivation.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.
N. Li and L. Carrel (2008)
PNAS 105, 17055-17060
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation.
D. Ciavatta, S. Kalantry, T. Magnuson, and O. Smithies (2006)
PNAS 103, 9958-9963
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A Functional Chromatin Domain Does Not Resist X Chromosome Inactivation: Silencing of cLys Correlates with Methylation of a Dual Promoter-Replication Origin.
S. Chong, J. Kontaraki, C. Bonifer, and A. D. Riggs (2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4667-4676
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Regulation of X-Chromosome Inactivation in Development in Mice and Humans.
T. Goto and M. Monk (1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 362-378
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Inactivation of an X-linked transgene in murine extraembryonic and adult tissues.
L Dandolo, C. Stewart, M. Mattei, and P. Avner (1993)
Development 118, 641-649
   Abstract »    PDF »
An X-linked human collagen transgene escapes X inactivation in a subset of cells.
H Wu, R Fassler, A Schnieke, D Barker, K. Lee, V Chapman, U Francke, and R Jaenisch (1992)
Development 116, 687-695
   Abstract »    PDF »
Transgenic animals.
R Jaenisch (1988)
Science 240, 1468-1474
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)