Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 8 February 1985:
Vol. 227. no. 4687, pp. 601 - 606
DOI: 10.1126/science.227.4687.601

Articles

The Agricultural Mechanization Controversy

Philip L. Martin 1 and Alan L. Olmstead 2

1 Associate professor of agriculture economics, University of California, Davis 95616.
2 Professor of economics and director of the Agricultural History Center, University of California, Davis 95616.

Attorneys of California Rural Legal Assistance are suing the University of California on behalf of 19 farm workers, alleging that publicly funded mechanization research displaces farm workers, eliminates small farmers, hurts consumers, impairs the quality of rural life, and impedes collective bargaining. This article reviews the evidence and finds that it does not support the charges. The mechanization lawsuit is important because applied research by universities is often authorized by legislation stipulating multiple goals, leaving researchers and universities vulnerable to lawsuits alleging that only some of the legislative goals are being pursued.





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)