Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 21 January 1983:
Vol. 219. no. 4582, pp. 285 - 286
DOI: 10.1126/science.219.4582.285

Articles

Removal of Uranium(VI) from Solution by Fungal Biomass and Fungal Wall-Related Biopolymers

M. GALUN 1, P. KELLER 1, D. MALKI 1, H. FELDSTEIN 2, E. GALUN 3, S. M. SIEGEL 4, and B. Z. SIEGEL 5

1 Department of Botany, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
2 Israel Atomic Energy Commission, Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Yavne, Israel
3 Department of Plant Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
4 Department of Botany, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu 96822
5 Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Penicillium digitatum mycelium can accumulate uranium from aqueous solutions of uranyl chloride. Azide present during the uptake tests does not inhibit the process. Killing the fungal biomass in boiling water or by treatment with alcohols, dimethyl sulfoxide, or potassium hydroxide increases the uptake capability to about 10,000 parts per million (dry weight). Formaldehyde killing does not enhance the uranium uptake. The inference that wall-binding sites were involved led to the testing of uranium uptake by chitin, cellulose, and cellulose derivatives in microcolumns. All were active, especially chitin.

Submitted on May 27, 1982
Revised on September 8, 1982





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)