Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 23 October 1981:
Vol. 214. no. 4519, pp. 401 - 407
DOI: 10.1126/science.7291981

Articles

Science, Vol 214, Issue 4519, 401-407
Copyright © 1981 by American Association for the Advancement of Science


articles

Carcinogen testing: current problems and new approaches

JH Weisburger and GM Williams

The classic procedures for testing potential carcinogens in animals have basically not changed in the past 50 years. Considerable knowledge of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis has accrued in the last 20 years, particularly concepts on the metabolic activation of chemicals to reactive electrophilic compounds that can interact with nucleophilic including DNA. These developments, in turn, have yielded a framework for integrating into carcinogen testing the determination of genetic effects of chemicals. A systematic decision point approach to carcinogen testing has been developed which entails a sequential decision-making process as specific tests are performed and evaluated prior to initiation of higher order, more complex tests. Compared to conventional bioassays in rodents, this approach provides knowledge based on mechanisms of carcinogenesis, yields a substantial amount of data at minimal cost, and forms a solid base for eventual heath risk assessment.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A Data-Based Assessment of Alternative Strategies for Identification of Potential Human Cancer Hazards.
A. R. Boobis, S. M. Cohen, N. G. Doerrer, S. M. Galloway, P. J. Haley, G. C. Hard, F. G. Hess, J. S. Macdonald, S. Thibault, D. C. Wolf, et al. (2009)
Toxicol Pathol 37, 714-732
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Operational Reversibility is a Key Aspect of Carcinogenesis.
J. I. Goodman (2001)
Toxicol. Sci. 64, 147-148
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A Perspective on Current and Future Uses of Alternative Models for Carcinogenicity Testing.
J. I. Goodman (2001)
Toxicol Pathol 29, 173-176
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Distinction between Genotoxic and Epigenetic Carcinogens and Implication for Cancer Risk.
J. H. Weisburger and G. M. Williams (2000)
Toxicol. Sci. 57, 4-5
   Full Text »    PDF »
Safety Assessment of Pharmaceuticals: Examples of Inadequate Assessments and a Mechanistic Approach to Assuring Adequate Assessment.
G. M. Williams (1997)
Toxicol Pathol 25, 32-38
   Abstract »    PDF »
Peroxisome Proliferation: A Biological Marker for Toxicological Evaluation.
J. K. Reddy, M. S. Rao, and A. V. Yeldandi (1992)
International Journal of Toxicology 11, 349-352
   Abstract »    PDF »
Carcinogens and human health: Part 1.
F. Perera (1990)
Science 250, 1644-1646
   PDF »
The rat as an experimental animal.
T. Gill 3rd, G. Smith, R. Wissler, and H. Kunz (1989)
Science 245, 269-276
   Abstract »    PDF »
Carcinogenicity of Chemicals: The Weight of Evidence.
R.L. Carter (1988)
Human and Experimental Toxicology 7, 411-418
   Abstract »    PDF »
Screening Toxic Chemicals: How Accurate Must Tests Be?.
L.B. Lave and G.S. Omenn (1988)
International Journal of Toxicology 7, 565-574
   Abstract »    PDF »
Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.
R. Tennant, B. Margolin, M. Shelby, E Zeiger, J. Haseman, J Spalding, W Caspary, M Resnick, S Stasiewicz, B Anderson, et al. (1987)
Science 236, 933-941
   Abstract »    PDF »
1 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Polysorbates 20, 21, 40, 60, 61, 65, 80, 81, and 85.
(1984)
International Journal of Toxicology 3, 1-82
   Abstract »    PDF »
Criteria for evidence of chemical carcinogenicity. Interdisciplinary Panel on Carcinogenicity.
(1984)
Science 225, 682-687
   Abstract »    PDF »
Initiation/Promotion Designs in Carcinogenicity Bioassays.
Y. Hayashi (1983)
Toxicol Pathol 11, 143-148
   Abstract »    PDF »
Chemical Carcinogens Without Mutagenic Activity: Peroxisome Proliferators As A Prototype.
J. K. Reddy, D. G. Scarpelli, V. Subbarao, and N. D. Lalwani (1983)
Toxicol Pathol 11, 172-180
   Abstract »    PDF »
Assessment of Technologies for Determining Cancer Risks from the Environment.
M. Gough (1983)
International Journal of Toxicology 2, 19-25
   PDF »
Phenotypic Properties of Preneoplastic Rat Liver Lesions and Applications to Detection of Carcinogens and Tumor Promoters.
G. M. Williams (1982)
Toxicol Pathol 10, 3-10
   Abstract »    PDF »
Proliferative liver lesions and sex steroids in rats.
J. Schuppler, R. Schulte-Hermann, I. Timmermann-Trosiener, and P. Gunzel (1982)
Toxicol Pathol 10, 132-143
   Abstract »    PDF »
Liver Lesions from Sex Steroids.
(1982)
Toxicol Pathol 10, 143-144
   PDF »
Hypolipidemics Carcinogenicity and Extrapolation of Experimental Results for Human Safety Assessments.
F. A. de la Iglesia and E. Farber (1982)
Toxicol Pathol 10, 152-170
   Abstract »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)