Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 7 December 1979:
Vol. 206. no. 4423, pp. 1141 - 1147
DOI: 10.1126/science.206.4423.1141
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

The Helium Question

Earl Cook 1

1 Professor of Geography and Geology at Texas A & M University, College Station 77843

Helium appears indispensable for certain energy-related uses that may be important 50 years from now, when helium-bearing natural gas, a much cheaper source than air, may be exhausted. Present demand, however, is lower than productive capacity, and much helium is being dissipated into the atmosphere as natural gas is burned for fuel. Controversy over the need for a government-directed helium-conservation program reflects fundamental differences in viewpoints on the economic future of industrial society, on the limits of substitution of labor and capital for a depleting resource, and on intergenerational equity and risk-bearing.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
The Continuing U.S. Helium Saga.
E. F. Hammel, E. F. Hammel, M. C. Krupka, and K. D. Williamson Jr. (1984)
Science 223, 789-792
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)