Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 7 July 1978:
Vol. 201. no. 4350, pp. 56 - 59
DOI: 10.1126/science.201.4350.56
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Seismic Amplitude Measurements Suggest Foreshocks Have Different Focal Mechanisms than Aftershocks

ALLAN LINDH 1, GARY FUIS 2, and CONSTANCE MANTIS 3

1 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, and Geophysics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
2 U.S. Geological Survey, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125
3 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025

The ratio of the amplitudes of P and S waves from the foreshocks and aftershocks to three recent California earthquakes show a characteristic change at the time of the main events. As this ratio is extremely sensitive to small changes in the orientation of the fault plane, a small systematic change in stress or fault configuration in the source region may be inferred. These results suggest an approach to the recognition of foreshocks based on simple measurements of the amplitudes of seismic waves.

Submitted on December 28, 1977
Revised on March 14, 1978


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes.
G. C. P. King, R. S. Stein, and J. Lin (1994)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84, 935-953
   Abstract »    PDF »
Change in Failure Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault System Caused by the 1992 Magnitude = 7.4 Landers Earthquake.
R. S. Stein, R. S. Stein, G. C. P. King, and J. Lin (1992)
Science 258, 1328-1332
   Abstract »    PDF »
Are ris events of M greater double equals 5 preceded by a couple of foreshocks of M greater double equals 4?.
H. K. GUPTA (1992)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82, 517-520
   PDF »
Apparent stresses, stress drops, and amplitude ratios of earthquakes preceding and following the 1975 Hawaii MS = 7.2 main shock.
F. R. ZUNIGA, M. WYSS, and M. E. WILSON (1987)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 77, 69-96
   Abstract »    PDF »
Seismicity associated with a cluster of earthquakes of mb greater double equals 4.5 near Adak, Alaska: Evidence for an asperity?.
J. R. BOWMAN and C. KISSLINGER (1985)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 75, 223-236
   Abstract »    PDF »
Foreshocks (1966-1980) in the San Andreas system, California.
L. M. JONES (1984)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 74, 1361-1380
   Abstract »    PDF »
Are reservoir-induced earthquakes of magnitude greater double equals 5.0 at Koyna, India, preceded by pairs of earthquakes of magnitude greater double equals 4.0?.
H. K. GUPTA and H. M. IYER (1984)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 74, 863-873
   Abstract »    PDF »
Variations in seismicity as a fundamental tool in earthquake prediction.
K. C. MCNALLY (1982)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72, S351-S366
   Abstract »    PDF »
Precursors to a magnitude 4.8 earthquake in the Virgin Islands: Spatial clustering of small earthquakes, anomalous focal mechanisms, and earthquake doublets.
A. FRANKEL (1982)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72, 1277-1294
   Abstract »    PDF »
Fault zone models, heat flow, and the depth distribution of earthquakes in the continental crust of the United States.
R. H. SIBSON (1982)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72, 151-163
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Pocatello Valley (Idaho-Utah border) earthquake sequence of March to April 1975.
W. J. ARABASZ, W. D. RICHINS, and C. J. LANGER (1981)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71, 803-826
   Abstract »    PDF »
Evaluation of S to P amplitude rations for determining focal mechanisms from regional network observations.
C. KISSLINGER (1980)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 70, 999-1014
   Abstract »    PDF »
Are foreshocks distinctive? Evidence from the 1966 Parkfield and the 1975 Oroville, California sequences.
W. H. BAKUN and T. V. MCEVILLY (1979)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 69, 1027-1038
   Abstract »    PDF »
Earthquake Swarm Along the San Andreas Fault near Palmdale, Southern California, 1976 to 1977.
K. C. McNally, K. C. MCNALLY, H. KANAMORI, J. C. PECHMANN, and G. FUIS (1978)
Science 201, 814-817
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)