Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 16 September 1977:
Vol. 197. no. 4309, pp. 1160 - 1162
DOI: 10.1126/science.197.4309.1160

Articles

Disasters as a Necessary Part of Benefit-Cost Analyses

R. K. Mark 1 and D. E. Stuart-Alexander 2

1 Physical scientist in the Branch of Western Environmental Geology at the U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025
2 Geologist in the Branch of Western Environmental Geology at the U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025

Benefit-cost analyses for water projects generally have not included the expected costs (residual risk) of low-probability disasters such as dam failures, impoundment-induced earthquakes, and landslides. Analysis of the history of these types of events demonstrates that dam failures are not uncommon and that the probability of a reservoir-triggered earth-quake increases with increasing reservoir depth. Because the expected costs from such events can be significant and risk is project-specific, estimates should be made for each project. The cost of expected damage from a "high-risk" project in an urban area could be comparable to project benefits.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Risk, uncertainty and nuclear power.
J. Elster (1979)
Social Science Information 18, 371-400



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)