Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 27 September 1974:
Vol. 185. no. 4157, pp. 1115 - 1123
DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1115
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Classification: Purposes, Principles, Progress, Prospects

Robert R. Sokal 1

1 State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook 11790

There is an intimate interrelation between principles and procedures in classification, and modern work in this field has been profoundly affected by the development of electronic computers. Besides the delineation of natural systems and the achievement of economy of memory and ease of manipulation, the primary purpose of classification is the description of the structure and relationship of groups of similar objects. Successful classifications generate scientific hypotheses, although much classificatory work has applied, practical goals. The acceptance of polythetic taxa is a major conceptual advance and has directly led to classifications based on many, equally weighted characteristics. The specification of data for classification by computer will enhance objectivity but not eliminate cultural and subjective biases. Techniques of classification include cluster analysis and ordination, and numerous ways of representing classifications have been elaborated recently. By the application of graph theory to some classificatory problems it has been possible to reconstruct evolutionary branching sequences. Computer classification has been successfully applied across a broad range of disciplines.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A Prototype Approach to Personality Disorder Diagnosis.
D. Westen, J. Shedler, and R. Bradley (2006)
Am J Psychiatry 163, 846-856
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Conceptualizing Cultural Groups and Cultural Difference: The Social Mechanism Approach.
R. Pierik (2004)
Ethnicities 4, 523-544
   Abstract »    PDF »
Refining Personality Disorder Diagnosis: Integrating Science and Practice.
J. Shedler and D. Westen (2004)
Am J Psychiatry 161, 1350-1365
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Comparing Member-Based Organizations within a Social Economy Framework.
J. Quarter, J. Sousa, B. J. Richmond, and I. Carmichael (2001)
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30, 351-375
   Abstract »    PDF »
A Qualitative/Interpretive Taxonomy of Stop Smoking Strategies (QU/ITS).
A. K. Cobb, M. J. Bott, K. A. O'Connell, J. M. Brown, L. C. Baumann, and J. L. Bigbee (1997)
West J Nurs Res 19, 702-725
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 1. Definition of Syndromes.
A. Leviton, M. Guild-Wilson, R. K. Neff, and P. Gambill (1993)
J Child Neurol 8, 43-53
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 3. A Reassessment.
A. Leviton, D. Bellinger, and E. Allred (1993)
J Child Neurol 8, 64-72
   Abstract »    PDF »
Methodological Issues in the Classification of Attention-Related Disorders.
J. M. Fletcher, R. D. Morris, and D. J. Francis (1991)
J Learn Disabil 24, 72-77
   Abstract »    PDF »
Applications of Multidimensional Scaling to Research in the Health Professions.
M. R. Raymond (1989)
Eval Health Prof 12, 379-408
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Principle of Proximal Similarity.
R. D. Brunner (1987)
Science Communication 9, 145-160
   Abstract »
The Far Side of Heterogeneity: A Critical Analysis of Empirical Subtyping Research in Learning Disabilities.
K. A. Kavale and S. R. Forness (1987)
J Learn Disabil 20, 374-382
   Abstract »    PDF »
The DSM-III Personality Disorders: Perspectives From Psychology.
T. A. Widiger and A. Frances (1985)
Arch Gen Psychiatry 42, 615-623
   Abstract »    PDF »
Chapter 2: Classification of Students with Handicaps.
M. C. Reynolds (1984)
Review of Research in Education 11, 63-92
   PDF »
Understanding School Behavior Disruption: Classifying School Environments.
M. D. Wiatrowski, G. Gottfredson, and M. Roberts (1983)
Environment and Behavior 15, 53-76
   Abstract »
Recongition and sexual selection in Drosophila: classification, quantification, and identification.
J. Leonard and L Ehrman (1976)
Science 193, 693-695
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)