Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 5 July 1974:
Vol. 185. no. 4145, pp. 27 - 39
DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4145.27
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities

Thomas W. Schoener 1

1 Biological Laboratories, 16 Divinity Avenue, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

To understand resource partitioning, essentially a community phenomenon, we require a holistic theory that draws upon models at the individual and population level. Yet some investigators are still content mainly to document differences between species, a procedure of only limited interest. Therefore, it may be useful to conclude with a list of questions appropriate for studies of resource partitioning, questions this article has related to the theory in a preliminary way.

1) What is the mechanism of competition? What is the relative importance of predation? Are differences likely to be caused by pressures toward reproductive isolation?

2) Are niches (utilizations) regularly spaced along a single dimension?

3) How many dimensions are important, and is there a tendency for more dimensions to be added as species number increases?

4) Is dimensional separation complementary?

5) Which dimensions are utilized, how do they rank in importance, and why? How do particular dimensions change in rank as species nuimber increases?

6) What is the relation of dimensional separation to difference in phenotypic indicators? To what extent does the functional relation of phenotype to resource characteristics constrain partitioning?

7) What is the distance between mean position of niches, what is the niche standard deviation, and what is the ratio of the two? What is the niche shape?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect.
A. L. Angert, T. E. Huxman, P. Chesson, and D. L. Venable (2009)
PNAS 106, 11641-11645
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems.
H. Olff, D. Alonso, M. P. Berg, B. K. Eriksson, M. Loreau, T. Piersma, and N. Rooney (2009)
Phil Trans R Soc B 364, 1755-1779
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Energetics and the evolution of carnivorous plants--Darwin's 'most wonderful plants in the world'.
A. M. Ellison and N. J. Gotelli (2009)
J. Exp. Bot. 60, 19-42
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Stage-specific predator species help each other to persist while competing for a single prey.
A. M. De Roos, T. Schellekens, T. Van Kooten, and L. Persson (2008)
PNAS 105, 13930-13935
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Relative resource abundance explains butterfly biodiversity in island communities.
N. Yamamoto, J. Yokoyama, and M. Kawata (2007)
PNAS 104, 10524-10529
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Indications of competition between non-indigenous round goby and native flounder in the Baltic Sea.
A. M. L. Karlson, G. Almqvist, K. E. Skora, and M. Appelberg (2007)
ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 479-486
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Mimicry in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): a field test of the competitive mimicry hypothesis.
A. Rashed and T. N. Sherratt (2007)
Behav. Ecol. 18, 337-344
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Using a theoretical ecospace to quantify the ecological diversity of Paleozoic and modern marine biotas.
P. M. Novack-Gottshall (2007)
Paleobiology 33, 273-294
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Niche breadth and geographical range: ecological compensation for geographical rarity in rainforest frogs.
Y. M Williams, S. E Williams, R. A Alford, M. Waycott, and C. N Johnson (2006)
Biol Lett 2, 532-535
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Resource partitioning between sexes in the "unconventional" hermit crab, Calcinus tubularis.
F. Gherardi (2004)
Behav. Ecol. 15, 742-747
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Enigmatic Biodiversity Correlations: Ant Diversity Responds to Diverse Resources.
I. Armbrecht, I. Perfecto, and J. Vandermeer (2004)
Science 304, 284-286
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs.
S. Portha, J.-L. Deneubourg, and C. Detrain (2002)
Behav. Ecol. 13, 776-781
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Temporal partitioning and aggression among foragers: modeling the effects of stochasticity and individual state.
S. A. Richards (2002)
Behav. Ecol. 13, 427-438
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Testing the role of competition in fossil communities using limiting similarity.
C. S. Hermoyian, L. R. Leighton, and P. Kaplan (2002)
Geology 30, 15-18
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: A field test of the storage effect.
C. E. Caceres (1997)
PNAS 94, 9171-9175
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Contributions of bird studies to biology.
M Konishi, S. Emlen, R. Ricklefs, and J. Wingfield (1989)
Science 246, 465-472
   Abstract »    PDF »
Neuromuscular patterns and the origin of trophic specialization in fishes.
G. Lauder (1983)
Science 219, 1235-1237
   Abstract »    PDF »
Intraspecific Vertical Stratification as a Mate-Finding Mechanism in Tropical Cockroaches.
C. SCHAL (1982)
Science 215, 1405-1407
   Abstract »    PDF »
Predatory Salamanders Reverse the Outcome of Competition Among Three Species of Anuran Tadpoles.
P. J. MORIN (1981)
Science 212, 1284-1286
   Abstract »    PDF »
Specialization: Species Property or Local Phenomenon?.
L. R. Fox and P. A. Morrow (1981)
Science 211, 887-893
   Abstract »    PDF »
Competition in Desert Rodents: An Experiment with Semipermeable Exclosures.
J. C. MUNGER and J. H. BROWN (1981)
Science 211, 510-512
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Ecological Perspective in Anthropology.
D. L. Hardesty (1980)
American Behavioral Scientist 24, 107-124
Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs.
J. H. Connell and J. H. Connell (1978)
Science 199, 1302-1310
   Abstract »    PDF »
Serengeti Ungulates: Feeding Selectivity Influences the Effectiveness of Plant Defense Guilds.
S. J. MCNAUGHTON (1978)
Science 199, 806-807
   Abstract »    PDF »
Competition Between Seed-Eating Rodents and Ants in Desert Ecosystems.
J. H. BROWN and D. W. DAVIDSON (1977)
Science 196, 880-882
   Abstract »    PDF »
Economic Models in Ecology.
D. J. Rapport and J. E. Turner (1977)
Science 195, 367-373
   PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)