Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 26 April 1974:
Vol. 184. no. 4135, pp. 475 - 477
DOI: 10.1126/science.184.4135.475

Articles

Heavy Metal Concentrations in Museum Fish Specimens: Effects of Preservatives and Time

Robert H. Gibbs Jr. 1, E. Jarosewich 2, and Herbert L. Windom 3

1 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
2 Department of Mineral Sciences, Smithsonian Institution
3 Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, 55 West Bluff Road, Savannah, Georgia 31406

Specimens of myctophid fish preserved for 1 month in formalin, ethyl alcohol, and isopropyl alcohol had higher concentrations of cadmium, copper, zinc, and sometimes lead, and lower concentrations of mercury and sometimes lead, than did unpreserved frozen specimens. Properties of the preservatives and species differences in fish tissues both influence these metal concentrations. Maximum concentrations of some metals in preserved specimens appear to be attained within a month, while concentrations of others may continue to increase for years. Metal tags or other materials in the preservative may cause higher maximum concentrations than the preservatives alone. Comparisons of concentrations of metals between museum specimens and unpreserved (frozen) specimens must be considered unreliable until the changes resulting from preservation are understood.





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)