Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 2 November 1973:
Vol. 182. no. 4111, pp. 443 - 449
DOI: 10.1126/science.182.4111.443
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Food Production and the Energy Crisis

David Pimentel 1, L. E. Hurd 1, A. C. Bellotti 2, M. J. Forster 2, I. N. Oka 2, O. D. Sholes 2, and R. J. Whitman 2

1 New York State College of Agriculture and Life Science
2 Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

The principal raw material of modern U.S. agriculture is fossil fuel, whereas the labor input is relatively small (about 9 hours per crop acre). As agriculture is dependent upon fossil energy, crop production costs will also soar when fuel costs increase two- to fivefold. A return of 2.8 kcal of corn per 1 kcal of fuel input may then be uneconomical.

Green revolution agriculture also uses high energy crop production technology, especially with respect to fertilizers and pesticides. While one may not doubt the sincerity of the U.S. effort to share its agricultural technology so that the rest of the world can live and eat as it does, one must be realistic about the resources available to accomplish this mission. In the United States we are currently using an equivalent of 80 gallons of gasoline to produce an acre of corn. With fuel shortages and high prices to come, we wonder if many developing nations will be able to afford the technology of U.S. agriculture.

Problems have already occurred with green revolution crops, particularly problems related to pests (57). More critical problems are expected when there is a world energy crisis. A careful assessment should be made of the benefits, costs, and risks of high energy-demand green revolution agriculture in order to be certain that this program will not aggravate the already serious world food situation (58).

To reduce energy inputs, green revolution and U.S. agriculture might employ such alternatives as rotations and green manures to reduce the high energy demand of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. U.S. agriculture might also reduce energy expenditures by substituting some manpower currently displaced by mechanization.

While no one knows for certain what changes will have to be made, we can be sure that when conventional energy resources become scarce and expensive, the impact on agriculture as an industry and a way of life will be significant. This analysis is but a preliminary investigation of a significant agricultural problem that deserves careful attention and greater study before the energy situation becomes more critical.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Cultural Wars and New Technologies: The Discourse of Plant Breeding and the Professionalisation of Mexican Agronomy, 1880-1994.
J. Cotter (2000)
Science Technology and Society 5, 141-168
   Abstract »    PDF »
Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective.
C. J. Cleveland, R. Costanza, C. A. S. Hall, and R. Kaufmann (1984)
Science 225, 890-897
   Abstract »    PDF »
Long-term biological consequences of nuclear war.
P. Ehrlich, J Harte, M. Harwell, P. Raven, C Sagan, G. Woodwell, J Berry, E. Ayensu, A. Ehrlich, T Eisner, et al. (1983)
Science 222, 1293-1300
   Abstract »    PDF »
Plant Productivity and Environment.
J. S. Boyer (1982)
Science 218, 443-448
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Labor of U.S. Farm Women: A Knowledge Gap.
E. Boulding (1980)
Work and Occupations 7, 261-290
   Abstract »
Animals as an Energy Source in Third World Agriculture.
G. M. Ward, T. M. Sutherland, and J. M. Sutherland (1980)
Science 208, 570-574
   Abstract »    PDF »
Gasohol: Does It or Doesn't It Produce Positive Net Energy?.
R. S. Chambers, R. A. Herendeen, J. J. Joyce, and P. S. Penner (1979)
Science 206, 789-795
   Abstract »    PDF »
High-Grade Fuels from Biomass Farming: Potentials and Constraints.
P. B. Weisz and J. F. Marshall (1979)
Science 206, 24-29
   Abstract »    PDF »
Photosynthetic Pathway and Biomass Energy Production.
D. L. Marzola and D. P. Bartholomew (1979)
Science 205, 555-559
   Abstract »    PDF »
Energy Balance for Ethyl Alcohol Production from Crops.
J. G. DA SILVA, G. E. SERRA, J. R. MOREIRA, J. C. CONCALVES, and J. GOLDEMBERG (1978)
Science 201, 903-906
   Abstract »    PDF »
Energy Conservation in Amish Agriculture.
W. A. Johnson, V. Stoltzfus, and P. Craumer (1977)
Science 198, 373-378
   PDF »
Natural resources and their management.
I.G. Simmons (1977)
Progress in Human Geography 1, 319-326
   PDF »
Land Degradation: Effects on Food and Energy Resources.
D. Pimentel, D. Pimentel, E. C. Terhune, R. Dyson-Hudson, S. Rochereau, R. Samis, E. A. Smith, D. Denman, D. Reifschneider, and M. Shepard (1976)
Science 194, 149-155
   PDF »
Prospects for High-Frequency Irrigation.
S. L. Rawlins and P. A. C. Raats (1975)
Science 188, 604-610
   PDF »
Nitrogen Fixation Research: A Key to World Food?.
R. W. F. Hardy and U. D. Havelka (1975)
Science 188, 633-643
   PDF »
Adaptation of Photosynthetic Processes to Stress.
J. A. Berry (1975)
Science 188, 644-650
   Abstract »    PDF »
Food Production and the Energy Crisis: A Comment.
V. W. Ruttan and D. Pimentel (1975)
Science 187, 560-561
   PDF »
Food, Fiber, and Energy.
S. H. WITTWER (1974)
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 128, 13-15
   Abstract »    PDF »
Energy Use in the U. S. Food System.
J. S. Steinhart and C. E. Steinhart (1974)
Science 184, 307-316
   PDF »
The Coal-Powered Heart.
C. E. Butterworth Jr. (1974)
JAMA 227, 934-935
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)