Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 19 January 1973:
Vol. 179. no. 4070, pp. 243 - 250
DOI: 10.1126/science.179.4070.243
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

Gene Flow and Population Differentiation

Studies of clines suggest that differentiation along environmental gradients may be independent of gene flow

John A. Endler 1

1 Department of zoology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

There are many possible spatial patterns of selection and gene flow that can produce a given cline structure; the actual geography of natural selection and gene flow must be worked out before an attempt is made to explain a given natural cline in terms of a model.

The results of experimental and theoretical models show that it is possible for local differentiation to evolve parapatrically in spite of considerable gene flow if the selection gradients are relatively uniform. Irregularities in environmental gradients increase the sensitivity of clines to the effects of gene flow in proportion to the increase in the differences in gene frequencies between the emigrants and the demes receiving the immigrants. It is not necessary for a sharp spatial environmental change to be present for distinct differentiation to occur. In some cases even a gentle environmental gradient can give rise to marked spatial differentiation along a genetically continuous series of demes; such environmental differences may be below the practical limits of resolution in field studies. Any asymmetry in gene flow does not lead to dedifferentiation if the environmental gradient is smooth; it merely shifts the position of the transition zone between the differentiated areas from that which would be expected if there were no asymmetry. Abrupt geographic differences in gene, genotype, or morph frequencies should not, therefore, be interpreted as evidence for environmental changes in the immediate vicinity of the steepest part of the cline; neither should they be interpreted as evidence for geographic barriers, sharp environmental differences, or sexual isolation among the differentiated groups of populations when there are no other sources of evidence for these phenomena. Gene flow may be unimportant in the differentiation of populations along environmental gradients.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Genetic Diversification, Vicariance, and Selection in a Polytypic Frog.
J. M. Robertson and K. R. Zamudio (2009)
J. Hered. 100, 715-731
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Gene Flow in the Face of Countervailing Selection: Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia in the {beta}A Hemoglobin Subunit of Yellow-Billed Pintails in the Andes.
K. G. McCracken, M. Bulgarella, K. P. Johnson, M. K. Kuhner, J. Trucco, T. H. Valqui, R. E. Wilson, and J. L. Peters (2009)
Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 815-827
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Single-Locus Polymorphism in a Heterogeneous Two-Deme Model.
B. Star, R. J. Stoffels, and H. G. Spencer (2007)
Genetics 176, 1625-1633
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
On the origin of Lake Malawi cichlid species: A population genetic analysis of divergence.
Y.-J. Won, A. Sivasundar, Y. Wang, and J. Hey (2005)
PNAS 102, 6581-6586
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Is the Prunella (Lamiaceae) hybrid zone structured by an environmental gradient? Evidence from a reciprocaltransplant experiment.
F. Fritsche and O. Kaltz (2000)
Am. J. Botany 87, 995-1003
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Ecological Genetics and Natural Selection in Molluscs: Climatic selection has an important effect on some patterns of gene distribution in snail populations.
J. S. Jones and J. S. Jones (1973)
Science 182, 546-552
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)