Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 22 December 1972:
Vol. 178. no. 4067, pp. 1255 - 1263
DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4067.1255

Articles

National Parks in Savannah Africa

Ecological requirements of parks must be balanced against socioeconomic constraints in their environs

Norman Myers 1

1 International Union for the Conservation of Nature; P.O. Box 48197, Nairobi, Kenya, East Africa

A national park is as integral to its regional environment as it is to the nation. Whether one wants to manage it that way or not, a park is dependent on the resources—human and physiobiological—of the environs, just as the environs are modified by the park's existence. This view may not jibe with the spirit of those who strive to protect a patch of old-time Africa as a refuge of serenity and stability in a world of tumult and change. But the park has its own ecology, just as does any creature within it, although the park's, being more abstract, is more difficult to discern. Planned or not, a park's future is even more enmeshed with the region's future than with the nation's. The ramifications of this relationship, especially the socioeconomic ones, are not always recognized, with the result that the enmeshing process sometimes sounds like a crunching of the gears. The worlds on both sides of the park boundary would get along better if there were a clear indication of what each can do for the other. By contrast, if they spend their energy resisting one another, there is little doubt as to which must be the ultimate "winner."





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)