Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 8 November 1968:
Vol. 162. no. 3854, pp. 661 - 665
DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3854.661

Articles

Venus: Lower Atmosphere Not Measured

Von R. Eshleman 1, Gunnar Fjeldbo 1, John D. Anderson 2, Arvydas Kliore 2, and Rolf B. Dyce 3

1 Center for Radar Astronomy, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91103
3 Cornell-Sydney University Astronomy Center, Arecibo Ionospheric Observatory, Arecibo, Puerto Rico 00612, and Stanford University

The common ranges of pressure and temperature of the atmosphere of Venus measured last October establish the connection between the Soviet Venera 4 altitude scale and the United States Mariner V radial scale. But if the Venera 4 measurements extended to the surface, as claimed, this comparison implies a radius of the planet which is about 25 kilometers greater than the radius deduced from Earth-based radar data. This impasse has been resolved in favor of the smaller value by a new determination of the radius which is more direct than the method used in deriving the radar radius, and which involves concurrent ranging from Earth both to Mariner V near encounter and to the surface of Venus. It is concluded that neither spacecraft reported on atmospheric conditions near the level of the mean surface, but extrapolations of the measurements yield surface values for mid-latitudes of 100 atmospheres pressure (within a factor of 1.5) and 700°K temperature (within 100°), in distinction to the Soviet values of 19±2 atmospheres and 544°±10°K. The higher values support radiometric and radar data on temperature and atmospheric absorption. It appears that the Soviet probe was not designed to work through such a thick atmosphere. A particularly simple (times two) ambiguity in the Venera 4 altimeter reading suggests itself, since this would bring all other data into excellent agreement and would explain the reason for the supposition that the probe reached the surface.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Venus: Chemical Weathering of Igneous Rocks and Buffering of Atmospheric Composition.
S. Nozette, S. NOZETTE, and J. S. LEWIS (1982)
Science 216, 181-183
   Abstract »    PDF »
Venus: Mass, Gravity Field, Atmosphere, and Ionosphere as Measured by the Mariner 10 Dual-Frequency Radio System.
H. T. Howard, H. T. Howard, G. L. Tyler, G. Fjeldbo, A. J. Kliore, G. S. Levy, D. L. Brunn, R. Dickinson, R. E. Edelson, W. L. Martin, et al. (1974)
Science 183, 1297-1301
   Abstract »    PDF »
Venus: The Next Phase of Planetary Exploration.
D. M. Hunten, D. M. Hunten, and R. M. Goody (1969)
Science 165, 1317-1323
   PDF »
Planetary Probe: Origin of Atmosphere of Venus.
R. F. Mueller and R. F. Mueller (1969)
Science 163, 1322-1324
   Abstract »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)