Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 14 June 1968:
Vol. 160. no. 3833, pp. 1218 - 1221
DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3833.1218

Articles

Density Distribution in Earth

Frank Press 1

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139

Earth models selected by a Monte Carlo procedure were tested against geophysical data; 5 million models were examined and six have passed all tests. Common features of successful models are an increased core radius and a chemically inhomogeneous core consistent with Fe-Ni alloy (20 to 50 percent Fe) for the solid portion and Fe-Si alloy (15 to 25 percent Fe) for the fluid core. The inhomogeneous mantle is consistent with an increase in the FeO:FeO + MgO ratio by a factor of 2 in the deep mantle. The transition zone is a region of not only phase change but also composition change; this condition would inhibit mantlewide convection. The upper-mantle solutions show large fluctuations in density; this state implies insufficient constraint on solutions for this region, or lateral variations in mantle composition ranging from pyrolite to eclogite.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Hotspots, Basalts, and the Evolution of the Mantle.
D. L. Anderson and D. L. Anderson (1981)
Science 213, 82-89
   Abstract »    PDF »
A Model for Plate Tectonic Evolution of Mantle Layers.
W. R. Dickinson, W. R. Dickinson, and W. C. Luth (1971)
Science 174, 400-404
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Upper Mantle of the Earth.
L. Knopoff and L. Knopoff (1969)
Science 163, 1277-1287
   PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)