Related Content
Search Google Scholar for:
|
|
Science 2 September 1966: Vol. 153. no. 3740, pp. 1074 - 1080 DOI: 10.1126/science.153.3740.1074
|
|
Articles
Distribution of Wild Wheats and Barley
Jack R. Harlan 1 and
Daniel Zohary 2
1 Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
2 Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
If we accept the evidence at face value, we are led to conclude that emmer was probably domesticated in the upper Jordan watershed and that einkorn was domesticated in southeast Turkey. Barley could have been domesticated almost anywhere within the arc bordering the fertile crescent. All three cereals may well have been harvested in the wild state throughout their regions of adaptation long before actual farming began. The primary habitats for barley, however, are not the same as those for the wheats. Wild barley is more xerophytic and extends farther downslope and into the steppes and deserts along the wadis. It seems likely that, while all three early cereals were domesticated within an are flanking the fertile crescent, each was domesticated in a different subregion of the zone.
Lest anyone should be led to think the problem is solved, we wish to close with a caveat. Domestication may not have taken place where the wild cereals were most abundant. Why should anyone cultivate a cereal where natural stands are as dense as a cultivated field? If wild cereal grasses can be harvested in unlimited quantities, why should anyone bother to till the soil and plant the seed? We suspect that we shall find, when the full story is unfolded, that here and there harvesting of wild cereals lingered on long after some people had learned to farm, and that farming itself may have orig inated in areas adjacent to, rather than in, the regions of greatest abundance of wild cereals.
We need far more specific information on the climate during incipient domestication and many more carefully conducted excavations of sites in the appropriate time range. The problem is far from solved, but some knowledge of the present distribution of the wild forms should be helpful.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
- Population-Based Resequencing Reveals That the Flowering Time Adaptation of Cultivated Barley Originated East of the Fertile Crescent.
- H. Jones, F. J. Leigh, I. Mackay, M. A. Bower, L. M.J. Smith, M. P. Charles, G. Jones, M. K. Jones, T. A. Brown, and W. Powell (2008)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
25, 2211-2219
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Molecular Diversity at 18 Loci in 321 Wild and 92 Domesticate Lines Reveal No Reduction of Nucleotide Diversity during Triticum monococcum (Einkorn) Domestication: Implications for the Origin of Agriculture.
- B. Kilian, H. Ozkan, A. Walther, J. Kohl, T. Dagan, F. Salamini, and W. Martin (2007)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
24, 2657-2668
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genome Plasticity a Key Factor in the Success of Polyploid Wheat Under Domestication.
- J. Dubcovsky and J. Dvorak (2007)
Science
316, 1862-1866
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the Fertile Crescent.
- P. L. Morrell and M. T. Clegg (2007)
PNAS
104, 3289-3294
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Adaptive climatic molecular evolution in wild barley at the Isa defense locus.
- J. K. Cronin, P. C. Bundock, R. J. Henry, and E. Nevo (2007)
PNAS
104, 2773-2778
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Photosynthesis and Productivity of Old and Modern Durum Wheats in a Mediterranean Environment.
- M. Koc, C. Barutcular, and I. Genc (2003)
Crop Sci.
43, 2089-2098
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Regional Subdivision in Wild Barley Allozyme Variation: Adaptive or Neutral?.
- S. Volis, I. Shulgina, D. Ward, and S. Mendlinger (2003)
J. Hered.
94, 341-351
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- AFLP Analysis of a Collection of Tetraploid Wheats Indicates the Origin of Emmer and Hard Wheat Domestication in Southeast Turkey.
- H. Ozkan, A. Brandolini, R. Schafer-Pregl, and F. Salamini (2002)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
19, 1797-1801
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The development and application of molecular markers for abiotic stress tolerance in barley.
- B.P. Forster, R.P. Ellis, W.T.B. Thomas, A.C. Newton, R. Tuberosa, D. This, R.A. El-Enein, M.H. Bahri, and M. Ben Salem (2000)
J. Exp. Bot.
51, 19-27
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Site of Einkorn Wheat Domestication Identified by DNA Fingerprinting.
- M. Heun, R. Schäfer-Pregl, D. Klawan, R. Castagna, M. Accerbi, B. Borghi, and F. Salamini (1997)
Science
278, 1312-1314
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
- Use of Barley in the Egyptian Late Paleolithic.
- F. Wendorf, F. Wendorf, R. Schild, N. El Hadidi, A. E. Close, M. Kobusiewicz, H. Wieckowska, B. Issawi, and H. Haas (1979)
Science
205, 1341-1347
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- Beginnings of Fruit Growing in the Old World.
- D. Zohary and P. Spiegel-Roy (1975)
Science
187, 319-327
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- Domestication of Pulses in the Old World: Legumes were companions of wheat and barley when agriculture began in the Near East.
- D. Zohary and M. Hopf (1973)
Science
182, 887-894
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- Agricultural Origins: Centers and Noncenters.
- J. R. Harlan (1971)
Science
174, 468-474
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- Prehistoric Investigations in Southeastern Turkey.
- R. J. Braidwood, H. Cambel, and P. J. Watson (1969)
Science
164, 1275-1276
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- Natural Environment of Early Food Production North of Mesopotamia.
- H. E. Wright Jr. (1968)
Science
161, 334-339
| PDF »
- Tetraploid Wheats: Seed Protein Electrophoretic Patterns of the Emmer and Timopheevi Groups.
- B. L. Johnson (1967)
Science
158, 131-132
| Abstract »
| PDF »
|
|