Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Published Online April 24, 2008
Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1153966

Reports

Submitted on December 10, 2007
Accepted on April 9, 2008

The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes

Simone Tilmes 1*, Rolf Müller 2, Ross Salawitch 3

1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.
2 Research Center Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
3 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Simone Tilmes , E-mail: tilmes{at}ucar.edu

The large burden of sulfate aerosols injected into the stratosphere by the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in 1991 cooled our planet and enhanced destruction of polar ozone in the following few years. The continuous injection of sulfur into the stratosphere has been suggested as a "geoengineering" scheme to counteract global warming. We use an empirical relationship between ozone depletion and chlorine activation to estimate how this approach might influence polar ozone. An injection of sulfur large enough to compensate surface warming due to the doubling of CO2 would cause a drastic increase in the extent of Arctic ozone depletion during the next century for cold winters and would cause a considerable delay, between 30 and 70 years, in the expected recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole.





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products