Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Submitted on February 26, 2007
Accepted on April 6, 2007
Hd3a Protein Is a Mobile Flowering Signal in Rice
Shojiro Tamaki 1, Shoichi Matsuo 1, Hann Ling Wong 1, Shuji Yokoi 2, Ko Shimamoto 1*
1 Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma 630-0101, Japan. 2 Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma 630-0101, Japan; Present address: Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka 020-8550, Japan.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ko Shimamoto , E-mail: simamoto{at}bs.naist.jp
Florigen, the mobile signal that moves from an induced leafto the shoot apex and causes flowering, has eluded identificationfor the 70 years since it was first proposed. Understandingthe nature of the mobile flowering signal would provide a keyinsight into the molecular mechanism of floral induction. Recentstudies suggest that the ArabidopsisFLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)gene is a candidate for encoding florigen. Here we show thatthe protein encoded by Hd3a, a rice ortholog of FT, moves fromthe leaf to the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and induces floweringin rice. These results suggest that the Hd3a protein may bethe rice florigen.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
NEWS OF THE WEEK
Elizabeth Pennisi (20 April 2007) Science316 (5823), 350.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.316.5823.350] |Summary »|Full Text »|PDF »
In Science Signaling
EDITORS' CHOICE
Pamela J. Hines (22 May 2007) Sci. STKE2007 (387), tw179.
[DOI: 10.1126/stke.3872007tw179] |Abstract »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A gene network for long-day flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice.
Cis-regulatory Changes at FLOWERING LOCUS T Mediate Natural Variation in Flowering Responses of Arabidopsis thaliana.
C. Schwartz, S. Balasubramanian, N. Warthmann, T. P. Michael, J. Lempe, S. Sureshkumar, Y. Kobayashi, J. N. Maloof, J. O. Borevitz, J. Chory, et al. (2009)
Genetics
183, 723-732
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Analysis of PHOTOPERIOD SENSITIVITY5 Sheds Light on the Role of Phytochromes in Photoperiodic Flowering in Rice.
F. Andres, D. W. Galbraith, M. Talon, and C. Domingo (2009)
Plant Physiology
151, 681-690
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Functional Analysis of FT and TFL1 Orthologs from Orchid (Oncidium Gower Ramsey) that Regulate the Vegetative to Reproductive Transition.
A cis Element within Flowering Locus T mRNA Determines Its Mobility and Facilitates Trafficking of Heterologous Viral RNA.
C. Li, K. Zhang, X. Zeng, S. Jackson, Y. Zhou, and Y. Hong (2009)
J. Virol.
83, 3540-3548
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Variations in Hd1 proteins, Hd3a promoters, and Ehd1 expression levels contribute to diversity of flowering time in cultivated rice.
Y. Takahashi, K. M. Teshima, S. Yokoi, H. Innan, and K. Shimamoto (2009)
PNAS
106, 4555-4560
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The 14-3-3 Protein GF14c Acts as a Negative Regulator of Flowering in Rice by Interacting with the Florigen Hd3a.
Y. A. Purwestri, Y. Ogaki, S. Tamaki, H. Tsuji, and K. Shimamoto (2009)
Plant Cell Physiol.
50, 429-438
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Analysis of the Pumpkin Phloem Proteome Provides Insights into Angiosperm Sieve Tube Function.
M.-K. Lin, Y.-J. Lee, T. J. Lough, B. S. Phinney, and W. J. Lucas (2009)
Mol. Cell. Proteomics
8, 343-356
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns of Arabidopsis NF-Y Transcription Factors Suggest Potential for Extensive Combinatorial Complexity.
N. Siefers, K. K. Dang, R. W. Kumimoto, W. E. Bynum IV, G. Tayrose, and B. F. Holt III (2009)
Plant Physiology
149, 625-641
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Mechanisms of Floral Induction in Grasses: Something Borrowed, Something New.
J. Colasanti and V. Coneva (2009)
Plant Physiology
149, 56-62
|Full Text »|PDF »
Long-Distance, Graft-Transmissible Action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein to Promote Flowering.
M. Notaguchi, M. Abe, T. Kimura, Y. Daimon, T. Kobayashi, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Tomita, K. Dohi, M. Mori, and T. Araki (2008)
Plant Cell Physiol.
49, 1645-1658
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Circadian Clock Proteins LHY and CCA1 Regulate SVP Protein Accumulation to Control Flowering in Arabidopsis.
S. Fujiwara, A. Oda, R. Yoshida, K. Niinuma, K. Miyata, Y. Tomozoe, T. Tajima, M. Nakagawa, K. Hayashi, G. Coupland, et al. (2008)
PLANT CELL
20, 2960-2971
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Acceleration of Flowering during Shade Avoidance in Arabidopsis Alters the Balance between FLOWERING LOCUS C-Mediated Repression and Photoperiodic Induction of Flowering.
A. C. Wollenberg, B. Strasser, P. D. Cerdan, and R. M. Amasino (2008)
Plant Physiology
148, 1681-1694
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Ehd2, a Rice Ortholog of the Maize INDETERMINATE1 Gene, Promotes Flowering by Up-Regulating Ehd1.
K. Matsubara, U. Yamanouchi, Z.-X. Wang, Y. Minobe, T. Izawa, and M. Yano (2008)
Plant Physiology
148, 1425-1435
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The nature of floral signals in Arabidopsis. II. Roles for FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and gibberellin.
The nature of floral signals in Arabidopsis. I. Photosynthesis and a far-red photoresponse independently regulate flowering by increasing expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT).
R. W. King, T. Hisamatsu, E. E. Goldschmidt, and C. Blundell (2008)
J. Exp. Bot.
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Two New Clock Proteins, LWD1 and LWD2, Regulate Arabidopsis Photoperiodic Flowering.
Reconfiguration of the Achene and Receptacle Metabolic Networks during Strawberry Fruit Development.
A. Fait, K. Hanhineva, R. Beleggia, N. Dai, I. Rogachev, V. J. Nikiforova, A. R. Fernie, and A. Aharoni (2008)
Plant Physiology
148, 730-750
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
RID1, encoding a Cys2/His2-type zinc finger transcription factor, acts as a master switch from vegetative to floral development in rice.
C. Wu, C. You, C. Li, T. Long, G. Chen, M. E. Byrne, and Q. Zhang (2008)
PNAS
105, 12915-12920
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Adaptation of aphid stylectomy for analyses of proteins and mRNAs in barley phloem sap.
F. Gaupels, A. Buhtz, T. Knauer, S. Deshmukh, F. Waller, A. J. E. van Bel, K.-H. Kogel, and J. Kehr (2008)
J. Exp. Bot.
59, 3297-3306
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Regulation of floral initiation in horticultural trees.
Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey (2008)
J. Exp. Bot.
|Full Text »|PDF »
A molecular genetic perspective of reproductive development in grapevine.
M. J. Carmona, J. Chaib, J. M. Martinez-Zapater, and M. R. Thomas (2008)
J. Exp. Bot.
59, 2579-2596
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
SPIN1, a K Homology Domain Protein Negatively Regulated and Ubiquitinated by the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase SPL11, Is Involved in Flowering Time Control in Rice.
M. E. Vega-Sanchez, L. Zeng, S. Chen, H. Leung, and G.-L. Wang (2008)
PLANT CELL
20, 1456-1469
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Coping Mechanisms for Crop Plants in Drought-prone Environments.
A Circadian Rhythm Set by Dusk Determines the Expression of FT Homologs and the Short-Day Photoperiodic Flowering Response in Pharbitis.
R. Hayama, B. Agashe, E. Luley, R. King, and G. Coupland (2007)
PLANT CELL
19, 2988-3000
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
FT Protein Movement Contributes to Long-Distance Signaling in Floral Induction of Arabidopsis.
L. Corbesier, C. Vincent, S. Jang, F. Fornara, Q. Fan, I. Searle, A. Giakountis, S. Farrona, L. Gissot, C. Turnbull, et al. (2007)
Science
316, 1030-1033
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Phloem-Borne FT Signals Flowering in Cucurbits.
N. A. Eckardt (2007)
PLANT CELL
19, 1435-1438
|Full Text »|PDF »
FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits.
M.-K. Lin, H. Belanger, Y.-J. Lee, E. Varkonyi-Gasic, K.-I. Taoka, E. Miura, B. Xoconostle-Cazares, K. Gendler, R. A. Jorgensen, B. Phinney, et al. (2007)
PLANT CELL
19, 1488-1506
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »