Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Submitted on January 23, 2006
Accepted on March 20, 2006
Synchrony, Waves, and Spatial Hierarchies in the Spread of Influenza
Cécile Viboud 1*, Ottar N. Bjørnstad 2, David L. Smith 1, Lone Simonsen 3, Mark A. Miller 1, Bryan T. Grenfell 4
1 Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 2 Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA; Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. 3 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20818, USA. 4 Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cécile Viboud , E-mail: viboudc{at}mail.nih.gov
Quantifying long-range dissemination of infectious diseasesis a key issue in their dynamics and control. Here, we use influenza-relatedmortality data to analyze the between-state progression of interpandemicinfluenza in the United States over the past 30 years. Outbreaksshow hierarchical spatial spread evidenced by higher pairwisesynchrony between more populous states. Seasons with higherinfluenza mortality are associated with higher disease transmissionand more rapid spread than mild ones. The regional spread ofinfection correlates more closely with rates of movement ofpeople to and from their workplaces (workflows) than with geographicaldistance. Workflows are described in turn by a gravity model,with a rapid decay of commuting up to around 100 kilometersand a long tail of rare longer range flow. A simple epidemiologicalmodel, based on the gravity formulation, captures the observedincrease of influenza spatial synchrony with transmissibility;high transmission allows influenza to spread rapidly beyondlocal spatial constraints.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL ISSUE
Caroline Ash and Leslie Roberts (21 April 2006) Science312 (5772), 379.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.312.5772.379] |Summary »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion.
P. Rohani, R. Breban, D. E. Stallknecht, and J. M. Drake (2009)
PNAS
106, 10365-10369
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in England and Wales: spatial patterns in transmissibility and mortality impact.
G. Chowell, L. M.A Bettencourt, N. Johnson, W. J Alonso, and C. Viboud (2008)
Proc R Soc B
275, 501-509
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Seasonality of Influenza in Brazil: A Traveling Wave from the Amazon to the Subtropics.
W. J. Alonso, C. Viboud, L. Simonsen, E. W. Hirano, L. Z. Daufenbach, and M. A. Miller (2007)
Am. J. Epidemiol.
165, 1434-1442
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Large-Scale Spatial-Transmission Models of Infectious Disease.